1995
DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90070-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective sero-epidemiological study of visceral leishmaniasis in Baringo district, Rift Valley Province, Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,11 Parasitologic confirmation might be the second-best standard for diagnosing VL, but not for diagnosing infection with L. donovani in a community at risk. Neither parasitology nor response to treatment are acceptable as a gold standard for L. donovani infection in humans, given the substantial proportion of asymptomatic infections in the community [26][27][28] and, to a lesser degree, the persistence of the serologic response in treated VL-patients. 29 In this study, we evaluated DAT validity for VL, and not for infection with the parasites that cause VL, in a series of VL patients and in persons without VL symptoms living in the same area at risk, i.e., the case-mix representative of an endemic area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,11 Parasitologic confirmation might be the second-best standard for diagnosing VL, but not for diagnosing infection with L. donovani in a community at risk. Neither parasitology nor response to treatment are acceptable as a gold standard for L. donovani infection in humans, given the substantial proportion of asymptomatic infections in the community [26][27][28] and, to a lesser degree, the persistence of the serologic response in treated VL-patients. 29 In this study, we evaluated DAT validity for VL, and not for infection with the parasites that cause VL, in a series of VL patients and in persons without VL symptoms living in the same area at risk, i.e., the case-mix representative of an endemic area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Harith and others initially proposed a reciprocal titer of a 1: 3,200 serum dilution as the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. 5 This value was subsequently used in community surveys in Sudan, 15,27 Kenya, 26,30 and Bangladesh, 24 as well as in clinical work in Sudan, 14,25 Ethiopia, 29,31 and Bangladesh. 17 In Somalia, Shiddo and others used a cut-off titer of 1:800 for population screening because it optimized sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global figure does not reflect the real importance of VL in affected communities, because VL has a focal distribution. Reported incidence rates of kala-azar in endemic areas vary between 2/1000 person-years in Kenya (Schaefer et al 1995), 14/1000 person-years in Ethiopia (Ali & Ashford 1994) and 40/1000 person-years in a community in eastern Sudan (Zijlstra et al 1994). Despite the considerable burden, there has been little attempt to quantify the economic consequences of the disease in these communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of infection to disease varies for L. infantum in Brazil (6.5:1, 9:1, 18.5:1), Spain (50:1), Iran (13:1); L. donovani in Bangladesh (4:1), India and Nepal (8.9:1), and L. donovani in Sudan (7:1,1.5:1), Kenya (6:1, 4:1), and Ethiopia (5.6:1, 11:1) (Evans et al, 1992;Badaro et al, 1986b,a;Ali and Ashford, 1994;Schaefer et al, 1995;Zijlstra et al, 1994;Hailu et al, 2009;Davies and Mazloumi Gavgani, 1999). Chapman et al (2015) estimate that 20% of asymptomatic infections develop into KA in Bangladesh, which is higher than other estimates, but utilises individual, longitudinal data over 3 years.…”
Section: Natural History Of Vl Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%