A prospective randomized double-blind trial of the efficacy of a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block on the 24h morphine consumption after posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery

Abstract

Background Spine surgery is associated with considerable postoperative pain and can be challenging to treat. A loco-regional technique suitable for spine surgery should cover the dorsal root of the spinal nerves at the levels where surgery is performed. The erector spinae block is a loco-regional technique with promising results and was recently described at the thoracic level. There are no randomized trials of this technique on a lumbar level. This study tests the hypothesis that the 24-h postoperative morphine consumption is significantly lower in patients undergoing posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery with a lumbar erector spinae (LUMBES) block when compared with a sham block. Methods This prospective randomized double-blind multicenter study will randomly allocate 80 adult patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery during general anesthesia to one of two groups as follows: (1) bilateral erector spinae block (20 mL 0.25% levobupivacaine) or (2) bilateral sham block (20 mL NaCl 0.9%). Our primary endpoint is 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary endpoints include 72-h morphine consumption, intraoperative sufentanil dosage, postoperative pain scores at regular time intervals both at rest and during movement, time to first postoperative mobilization, and the Quality of Recovery 40 survey score. Discussion The LUMBES trial is a pragmatic clinical study that will provide evidence of whether a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block is effective in reducing 24-h postoperative morphine consumption in patients undergoing lumbar inter-body fusion surgery. If this hypothesis is confirmed, this finding could contribute to more widespread implementation of this technique. Trial registration Local ethics committee B300201837508, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03825198 . Registered on 31 Jan 2019. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3541-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

<p>Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review</p>

“…Only one case report mentioned that ESPB could effectively reduce the use of analgesia and muscle relaxant drugs during the perioperative period of spondylolisthesis correction surgery, and appropriate hypotension was beneficial to surgical visual field exposure and operation. 37 Reducing the use of perioperative anesthetics cannot only reduce the cost of hospitalization, but also reduce the possible side effects of extensive use of anesthetics. At present, some scholars believe that perioperative use of opioids can affect the immune function of patients, and may be associated with the poor prognosis of tumor patients.…”

An Update on Postoperative Opioid Use and Alternative Pain Control Following Spine Surgery

“…Other series with cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine surgery patient populations have also validated these findings. 76 Although research largely supports multimodal approaches to postoperative prescribing. Further research is necessary to continue drug combination optimization.…”

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for postoperative analgesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

“…16 full text publications remained were scrutinized for conclusive identified. 4 of them were excluded because 2 did not report data of interest [13,14], one was currently ongoing study [15],one was review article [16]. All RCTs included in this meta-analysis were published between 2018 and 2019, with a total of 490.…”