1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1992.tb00957.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective randomized double blind trial comparing prednisolone and 4‐aminosalicylic acid enemas in acute distal ulcerative colitis

Abstract: A prospective double blind and randomized study was conducted to compare 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) and prednisolone-21-phosphate enemas in inducing remission in patients with acute distal ulcerative colitis. Patients with ulcerative colitis distal to the splenic flexure as assessed by flexible colonoscopy, barium enema and histology were included in the study. Of 40 consecutive patients, 20 were randomized to each of the two treatment groups. Clinical evaluation was done weekly; sigmoidoscopy and histology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two randomized trials compared a 2 g 4-ASA (paraaminosalicylic acid) enema with a 20-mg prednisolone enema of equal volume (50 or 60 ml) in patients with distal ulcerative colitis (38,39). The pooled results favored 4ASA for inducing clinical improvement (pooled OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.01-9.70) and also showed a trend in favor of 4-ASA for inducing clinical remission (pooled OR 1.91, 95% CI 0.76 -4.86) (16).…”
Section: Studies Comparing Rectal 5-asa and Conventional Rectal Cortimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two randomized trials compared a 2 g 4-ASA (paraaminosalicylic acid) enema with a 20-mg prednisolone enema of equal volume (50 or 60 ml) in patients with distal ulcerative colitis (38,39). The pooled results favored 4ASA for inducing clinical improvement (pooled OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.01-9.70) and also showed a trend in favor of 4-ASA for inducing clinical remission (pooled OR 1.91, 95% CI 0.76 -4.86) (16).…”
Section: Studies Comparing Rectal 5-asa and Conventional Rectal Cortimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 4‐ASA has been tested in the treatment of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease, in oral form with colonic delivery formulations (1.5–6 g/day), and in topical form (2–4 g/day). 5–14 Side effects of these new formulations have also been uncommon and moderate: abdominal pain, fever, bloating, and headache. A few cases of abnormal liver function tests have been reported, but no case of symptomatic acute pancreatitis was described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4‐aminosalicylic acid ( 4‐ASA), which differs from 5‐ASA in the position of the NH 2 group, has also been shown to be effective in inflammatory bowel disease; in enemas or in oral formulations. 5–14 The possibility of cross reactions between 4‐ASA and 5‐ASA has never been evaluated. We report three cases of patients with IBD who developed acute pancreatitis related to 5‐ASA and subsequently tolerated 4‐ASA enemas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%