2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, and multicenter trial of prophylactic effects of ramosetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after craniotomy: comparison with ondansetron

Abstract: BackgroundCraniotomy patients have a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This prospective, randomized, double-blind, multi-center study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic ramosetron in preventing PONV compared with ondansetron after elective craniotomy in adult patients.MethodsA total of 160 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II patients aged 19–65 years who were scheduled to undergo elective craniotomy for various intracranial lesions were enrol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite great advances in modern neurosurgical techniques and anesthesia, PONV remains one of the most common postoperative concerns and challenges for subjects and clinicians after craniotomy. Its incidence has been reported to be high as 73% after craniotomy, and it usually leads to patient discomfort, delayed discharge from the hospital, and increased medical costs [2,3]. In addition, PONV may result in an increased risk of aspiration, intracranial hypertension, and neurological deterioration in neurosurgical patients [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite great advances in modern neurosurgical techniques and anesthesia, PONV remains one of the most common postoperative concerns and challenges for subjects and clinicians after craniotomy. Its incidence has been reported to be high as 73% after craniotomy, and it usually leads to patient discomfort, delayed discharge from the hospital, and increased medical costs [2,3]. In addition, PONV may result in an increased risk of aspiration, intracranial hypertension, and neurological deterioration in neurosurgical patients [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bolus administration of 0.3 mg ramosetron showed better anti-emetic efficacy than that of 4 mg i.v. ondansetron in earlier studies [13,14]. This may be due to the additional ondansetron that was mixed in the i.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In earlier studies that compared the prophylactic efficacies of ramosetron and ondansetron, 0.3 mg ramosetron demonstrated better efficacy for reducing PONV and increased the complete response rate compared with 4 mg ondansetron . However, those studies included small to moderate sample sizes and only a single type of surgery , and comparative studies in low risk groups have not been performed . Anti‐emetic efficacy could be exaggerated if the drug is evaluated selectively in a population with a high incidence of PONV, because PONV occurs more frequently in populations with higher Apfel scores .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nausea and vomiting were symptoms referred by patients with pain. Prophylactic administration of antiemetics may decrease and/or prevent nausea and vomiting in patients submitted to craniotomy 15 . Adequate prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting minimizes possible postoperative troubles such as bronchial aspiration, hydroelectrolyte imbalance and increased intracranial pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%