2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure dressing and conventional dressing methods on split-thickness skin grafts in burned patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, split-skin take was rather high when using TNP. These findings are in accordance with the outcome in nondiabetic burn patients 12,13 and may be explained by the reduction of hematoma and seroma and better graft fixation on the wound bed with reduced shear stress. 19 Different factors can delay the wound healing process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, split-skin take was rather high when using TNP. These findings are in accordance with the outcome in nondiabetic burn patients 12,13 and may be explained by the reduction of hematoma and seroma and better graft fixation on the wound bed with reduced shear stress. 19 Different factors can delay the wound healing process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…8,9,11 It is known that topical negative pressure (TNP) dressings alias negative pressure wound therapy can increase graft take rate, even in burned patients. 12,13 However, the effectiveness of TNP on grafts in diabetic patients with foot scalds has never been reported. Therefore, we compared the outcome of antiseptic dressing with a circular TNP dressing on the freshly laid split-thickness skin graft (SSG) after tangential excision in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients after deep dermal scald of the foot (Figures 1 and 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, NPWT can stimulate the healing of the wound, reduce inflammatory stimulus to the wound, and alleviate local pain for patients [26,27]. Cro C et al have shown that negative pressure draining can stimulate more growth of new blood vessels and significantly increases wound blood flow by improving the microcirculation [8,28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Its application to split and full-thickness skin grafts is of particular relevance to dermatologic surgery. Several randomized controlled trials [5][6][7] have been conducted that reveal statistically significant improvement in not only graft take but also graft appearance with the use of NPWT when compared with traditional bolster dressings. These results are not surprising when considering the VAC's mechanism of action and the common reasons for skin graft failure.…”
Section: Negative-pressure Wound Therapymentioning
confidence: 98%