1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80138-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
226
1
20

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
21
226
1
20
Order By: Relevance
“…This is parallel with the results shown by other research worker in most of the studies. 6,11,12,[17][18][19][20] An overall look at the various studies done so far, and in confirmation with our results, it is clearly appreciated that the more severe the appendicitis, the less often laparoscopic appendectomy is of benefit. Another important point noted here, that in so many cases, surgical treatment is not necessary and may subside with antibiotics.…”
Section: Figure 1: Hospital Staysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is parallel with the results shown by other research worker in most of the studies. 6,11,12,[17][18][19][20] An overall look at the various studies done so far, and in confirmation with our results, it is clearly appreciated that the more severe the appendicitis, the less often laparoscopic appendectomy is of benefit. Another important point noted here, that in so many cases, surgical treatment is not necessary and may subside with antibiotics.…”
Section: Figure 1: Hospital Staysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[18][19][20] Wound infection was significantly high in OA than LA which affected the quality of life of patients. The lower rate of wound infection in LA group may be due to placement of detached appendix in an endobag before removing from abdominal cavity thus minimizing contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, our study group has strictly prohibited any equity interest in a company whose patented therapeutic drug or device is under trial. 5 To the Editor: Martin and Kasper conclude by suggesting that "our ultimate aim is to find a solution that creates the most just and prudent balance among the interests of academic science, industry, and most important, the public." However, the public to which the authors refer throughout their editorial is American.…”
Section: Conflict-of-interest Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that chemical meningitis accounts for half the serious complications resulting from a single intrathecal injection of 40 to 80 mg of methylprednisolone; the other complications are transverse myelitis, cauda equina syndrome, lumbar radiculitis, intractable headache, and urinary retention. 4,5 Chronic arachnoiditis with severe pain is most often associated with multiple injections. The neurotoxic effects of intrathecal steroid formulations have been attributed to sensitivity to the local anesthetic, the steroid, hyperbaric mixtures, or the steroid preservative (benzyl alcohol, benzalkonium chloride, or polyethylene glycol).…”
Section: Intrathecal Methylprednisolone For Postherpetic Neuralgiamentioning
confidence: 99%