2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis With Two Different Lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 This study is unique in that a femtosecond laser was used to create all flaps, eliminating the use of different microkeratomes as a source of potential HOA variability. Recent data 24 suggest that for flap creation, the femtosecond laser creates fewer HOAs than the mechanical microkeratomes used in these previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 This study is unique in that a femtosecond laser was used to create all flaps, eliminating the use of different microkeratomes as a source of potential HOA variability. Recent data 24 suggest that for flap creation, the femtosecond laser creates fewer HOAs than the mechanical microkeratomes used in these previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were required to be at least 21 years of age and have myopic refractive error between ÿ1.00 and ÿ7.00 diopters (D), with less than ÿ3.00 D of astigmatism (measured via cycloplegic subjective refraction). 7 Patients were excluded from participating in this trial if (1) they had a difference in high-contrast visual acuity of 4 or more letters between eyes, (2) visual acuity worse than 20/32 in either eye, (3) spherical anisometropia more than 1.00 D, (4) cylindrical anisometropia more than 0.75 D, (5) an intended ablation that would leave an estimated corneal thickness less than 250 mm, (6) anterior segment pathology or previous ocular surgery, or (7) a history of systemic autoimmune disease or immunosuppressive therapy, or were pregnant or lactating. Hydrogel lens wearers were required to discontinue lens wear 2 weeks before surgery, and rigid gas-permeable lens wearers were required to discontinue wear 3 weeks before surgery.…”
Section: Refractive Surgery Samplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…[1][2][3][4] Wavefront-guided systems increase the predictability of visual outcomes and may reduce the amount of induced aberrations compared with conventional LASIK surgery. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] One important question is whether there are differences in visual outcomes between the available wavefront-guided systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%