2002
DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.2.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital

Abstract: Objectives: To establish a chest pain observation unit, monitor its performance in terms of appropriate discharge after assessment, and estimate the cost per patient. Methods: Prospective, observational, cohort study of patients attending a large, city, teaching hospital accident and emergency department between 1 March 1999 and 29 February 2000 with acute undifferentiated chest pain. Patients were managed on a chest pain observation unit, entailing two to six hours of observation, serial electrocardiograph re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other observation units, the most common reason for admission is chest pain (Goodacre, Morris, Campbell, Arnold, & Angelini, 2002). Observation unit admission rates for chest pain at our experimental site exceed 1,800 cases per year.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similar to other observation units, the most common reason for admission is chest pain (Goodacre, Morris, Campbell, Arnold, & Angelini, 2002). Observation unit admission rates for chest pain at our experimental site exceed 1,800 cases per year.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Approximately 25% of patients attending with chest pain are assessed on a chest pain observation unit (CPOU). 5 The remaining 75% are excluded for the following reasons: 1) new ECG changes consistent with ischemia, defined as >1 mm ST elevation or depression, or >3 mm Twave inversion in two contiguous leads, or new left bundle branch block (approximately 10%); 2) comorbidity (such as heart failure or arrhythmia) or alternative serious pathology (such as pulmonary embolus) necessitating admission (18%); 3) definite unstable angina, defined as known coronary heart disease (CHD) with prolonged or recurrent episodes of typical anginal pain (35%); and 4) minimal risk of CHD, e.g., age less than 25 years, pain related to recent trauma (12%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity can be further enhanced by using the rate of change of biomarkers in addition to the absolute value. Well-validated protocols using the combination of CK-MB and troponin testing over a 6-hour period following admission have been shown to be clinically safe and costeffective [77,78] . Alternative strategies have been proposed utilising shorter sampling intervals.…”
Section: Patients Presenting Without St Elevation Considered At Low Rmentioning
confidence: 99%