2020
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective, Multicenter Registry Study to Evaluate the Clinical Feasibility of Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) in Node-positive Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of non-radioactive TLN biopsy and TAD in routine clinical practice. Background Data: TAD involves TLN biopsy (TLNB) and sentinel lymph node biopsy and was recently introduced as a new standard for less invasive axillary staging in BC patients undergoing neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST); however, clinical evidence is limited. Methods: The SenTa study is a prospective registry study conducted at 50 centers. Patients with invasive BC wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
101
2
25

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
101
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in the largest study on carbon solution-based TAD, 25% of patients had ≥4 and 4% had ≥10 suspicious nodes before NACT [47]. 124 out of 423 (29%) patients enrolled in the SENTA trial had at least three abnormal nodes [29]. Intuitively, the more nodes appear suspicious on initial ultrasound, the more probable it is for the TAD to miss residual disease, especially in case only one node was marked, thus resulting in a higher FNR [60].…”
Section: Is Tad Safe For All Patients?mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, in the largest study on carbon solution-based TAD, 25% of patients had ≥4 and 4% had ≥10 suspicious nodes before NACT [47]. 124 out of 423 (29%) patients enrolled in the SENTA trial had at least three abnormal nodes [29]. Intuitively, the more nodes appear suspicious on initial ultrasound, the more probable it is for the TAD to miss residual disease, especially in case only one node was marked, thus resulting in a higher FNR [60].…”
Section: Is Tad Safe For All Patients?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The results of the prospective German multicenter SENTA register study were presented at the ESMO conference in 2019 and are now available as a full publication [28,29]. In this study, the TLN was clipped before NACT in 473 patients.…”
Section: Which Marking Technique Is Optimal?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the German experts emphasise that the AGO recommends both: TAD and ALND in the situation of ycN0. If the TLN corresponds to the SLN, a negative SLN suffices 14 , 15 . More than 80% of SG-BCC panellists (82%) recommend ALND when a patient with cN1 status (biopsy confirmed) has not responded or has only responded marginally to NAST (ypN1).…”
Section: Local Treatment Following Nastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die deutsche Expertengruppe betont, dass auf eine ALND verzichtet werden kann, wenn sowohl der TLN als auch der SLN tumorfrei ist. Entspricht der TLN dem SLN, reicht ein negativer SLN aus [14,15]. Über 80 % der SG-BCC-Panelisten (82 %) empfehlen eine ALND, wenn eine Patientin mit cN1-Status (bioptisch gesichert) nicht oder nur marginal auf eine NAST angesprochen hat (ypN1).…”
Section: Verzicht Auf Alnd Möglich?unclassified