2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective, multicenter evaluation of ablating complex fractionated electrograms (CFEs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) identified by an automated mapping algorithm: Acute effects on AF and efficacy as an adjuvant strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
152
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
152
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been further proposed that these fractionated sites are important in sustaining AF, 53 and that targeting fractionated electrograms with ablation can terminate AF and prevent its re-induction or recurrence. 52,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60] The data supporting these conclusions are rather weak overall, with only a few small, randomised clinical trials providing guidance, and different studies have arrived at disparate conclusions regarding the importance, or lack thereof, of fractionated electrograms in the pathogenesis of AF.…”
Section: Limitations Of Targeting Rotors With Ablation For the Treatmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been further proposed that these fractionated sites are important in sustaining AF, 53 and that targeting fractionated electrograms with ablation can terminate AF and prevent its re-induction or recurrence. 52,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60] The data supporting these conclusions are rather weak overall, with only a few small, randomised clinical trials providing guidance, and different studies have arrived at disparate conclusions regarding the importance, or lack thereof, of fractionated electrograms in the pathogenesis of AF.…”
Section: Limitations Of Targeting Rotors With Ablation For the Treatmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Verma et. al (Verma et al, 2008), the overall agreement between algorithm-labeled (defined as mean cycle length < 120 ms) and investigator-labeled CFAEs sites was 86% for two independent investigators combined. In the study by Wu et.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Sites with highly fractionated A-EGMs almost fully encompass the sites with high DF but not always vice versa. For that reason, algorithms implemented in commercially available mapping systems were designed for detection of CFAEs rather than high DF (Scherr et al, 2007) and (Verma et al, 2008). These time-domain algorithms require specific input parameters being more flexible but, on the other hand, operator-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations