2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins After Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: The RECORd1 Italian Project

Abstract: The early oncological goal of any partial nephrectomy (PN) is to achieve negative surgical margins (SMs). Several factors have been advocated as predictors of positive SMs (PSMs) after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). In our study, age, upper pole tumor location, standard PN and Fuhrman 3/4 nuclear grade were found to be independent predictors of PSMs at multivariable analysis. Further evaluations are required to verify the oncological effect of the PSM on local and systemic recurrence. Background: The purpose o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
20
1
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(50 reference statements)
5
20
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Irregular forms of aggressive and infiltrative cancers and their growth patterns cause difficult dissection and consequently increased PSM rates. In a prospective, multi‐centre study in 2015 with 800 patients, a statistically significant difference was found between surgical margin status and tumour grade 19 . In our study, nuclear grades of patients with PSM and NSM were significantly different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irregular forms of aggressive and infiltrative cancers and their growth patterns cause difficult dissection and consequently increased PSM rates. In a prospective, multi‐centre study in 2015 with 800 patients, a statistically significant difference was found between surgical margin status and tumour grade 19 . In our study, nuclear grades of patients with PSM and NSM were significantly different.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…Ani et al found a statistically significant relationship between PSM and stage 9 . Schiavina et al found no association between PSM and tumour stage and size 19 . Bensalah et al also evaluated the PSM and tumour stage and found no significant correlation between T‐stage and surgical margin status 20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, large series have analyzed the preoperative risk factors for PSM after PN. Several factors have been advocated as predictors, such as older age, tumour size, location, pathological stage, Fuhrman grade and indication (elective vs. imperative) [ 5 , 13 15 ]. Correspondingly, conflicting evidence has accumulated on whether PSM is also a significant risk factor for disease progression, while large-scale studies like Yossepowitch et al, Lopez-Costea et al or Antic et al suggest no correlation between PSM and local recurrence or distant progression [ 14 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large, multicenter retrospective series, the Surveillance and Treatment Update Renal Cancer (SATURN) study found a PSM rate of 0.2% with SE and 3.4% with PN (p=<0.001) (28). Similarly, the prospective Italian Registry of Conservative Renal Surgery (RECORd) project found PSM rates of 1.6% and 7.4% with SE and PN, respectively (p=<0.001) (29). …”
Section: Surgical Marginsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Overall, positive surgical margins (PSMs) are relatively rare events at the time of NSS, with current literature identifying positive surgical margin (PSM) rates after PN to range from 0% to 7% (29,38–41). When investigating the significance of a PSM on final pathological analysis, little effect on survival has been shown (40–42).…”
Section: Surgical Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%