2017
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective, multi‐center study assessing early loading with short implants in posterior regions. A 3‐year post‐loading follow‐up study

Abstract: Background: Few prospective studies about early loading of short implant have been available and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implant position in posterior was identified as the risk indicator, with the RR value of 10.91 for risk of peri‐implantitis. Han and colleagues reported a survival rate of 95.8% in posterior region for 3‐year follow‐up . Douglas reported a high rate of implant failure of 6% with 2 years' function in posterior region with advanced alveolar ridge height resorption in treated periodontitis patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implant position in posterior was identified as the risk indicator, with the RR value of 10.91 for risk of peri‐implantitis. Han and colleagues reported a survival rate of 95.8% in posterior region for 3‐year follow‐up . Douglas reported a high rate of implant failure of 6% with 2 years' function in posterior region with advanced alveolar ridge height resorption in treated periodontitis patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine studies reported no early failure, and the other eleven studies reported early failures varying from 1.87% to 4.76% …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regarding the follow‐up periods of included studies, six studies had a 1‐year follow‐up; two studies presented a 2‐year follow‐up; five studies reported 3‐year follow‐up; one study reported 4.75‐year follow‐up; and six studies reported outcomes of 5‐year follow‐up …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bone loss less than 1.0 mm was shown in 12.7% implants, and bone gain as much as 1.9 mm was shown in 22.5% implants. No change in bone level was shown in 62.0% implants (Han, Tang, Zhang, & Meng, ). In the current study, the proportion of implants showing bone gain was 61.4%, which was even higher than that reported by Han et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%