2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective longitudinal study of naturally infected horses to evaluate the performance characteristics of rapid diagnostic tests for equine influenza virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such circumstances, the ELISA should only be the test of choice in laboratories that do not have the expertise to perform HI or SRH. However, analysis of samples from experimentally infected foals confirmed the findings of Kittelberger et al ., and Read et al ., that in the naïve animal, an ELISA is extremely sensitive and can detect an antibody response by day seven post‐infection. This sensitivity combined with the fact that the ELISA, unlike the HI or the SRH, can be readily automated and used to rapidly screen large numbers of samples suggest that it is an appropriate test for monitoring the spread of EI in a naïve population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In such circumstances, the ELISA should only be the test of choice in laboratories that do not have the expertise to perform HI or SRH. However, analysis of samples from experimentally infected foals confirmed the findings of Kittelberger et al ., and Read et al ., that in the naïve animal, an ELISA is extremely sensitive and can detect an antibody response by day seven post‐infection. This sensitivity combined with the fact that the ELISA, unlike the HI or the SRH, can be readily automated and used to rapidly screen large numbers of samples suggest that it is an appropriate test for monitoring the spread of EI in a naïve population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This sensitivity combined with the fact that the ELISA, unlike the HI or the SRH, can be readily automated and used to rapidly screen large numbers of samples suggest that it is an appropriate test for monitoring the spread of EI in a naïve population. A nucleoprotein ELISA was used to screen approximately 62 000 samples in 6 months after EI was detected in Australia in 2007 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a minority tested positive for up to 34 days after the onset of clinical signs. In contrast, virus was only isolated from nasal swabs for 6–7 days after clinical signs were first observed 38. EIV strains that previously circulated among horses in Argentina, in the 1990s, group within the South American sub‐lineage of the American lineage8, 10, 12 as does the virus that caused the 2006 outbreak in Chile 26.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%