2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Feasibility Study of Duplex Ultrasound Arterial Mapping, Digital-Subtraction Angiography, and Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Management of Critical Lower Limb Ischemia by Endovascular Revascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Replacing DSA with a noninvasive diagnostic technique will reduce contrast-related complications, patient discomfort, and may also save costs. [3][4][5] Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a noninvasive technique for evaluation of peripheral vascular disease and previous studies have shown good agreement between DUS and DSA. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] It is easy to perform, has no side effects, and is relatively inexpensive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Replacing DSA with a noninvasive diagnostic technique will reduce contrast-related complications, patient discomfort, and may also save costs. [3][4][5] Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a noninvasive technique for evaluation of peripheral vascular disease and previous studies have shown good agreement between DUS and DSA. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] It is easy to perform, has no side effects, and is relatively inexpensive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If DUAM failed to show any outflow vessels, yet the patient was deemed fit to withstand a revascularization procedure, then further imaging was done with computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or both. 18 If neither modalities showed any reconstructible outflow, and the patient had tissue loss and was fit for revascularization, then the presence or absence of any options for revascularization was confirmed with on-table digital subtraction angiography (DSA). 18 SCBD protocol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 If neither modalities showed any reconstructible outflow, and the patient had tissue loss and was fit for revascularization, then the presence or absence of any options for revascularization was confirmed with on-table digital subtraction angiography (DSA). 18 SCBD protocol. After obtaining informed consent, patients were commenced on a treatment protocol that lasted 12 weeks 5 or until they required amputation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the procedure, ABI improvement and patency of reconstruction are similar when DUS or CA is used for preoperative planning. 2,3,[6][7][8][9] These studies have also shown that the accuracy and concordance of DUS with CA are not dependent on PAD severity (claudication vs CLI) or adjacent disease. 10,11 Concordance between DUS and CA is best in the suprageniculate arteries of the lower extremity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%