2021
DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piaa159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prospective Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Childhood Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Uganda

Abstract: Background Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) has improved the sensitivity to detect pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in adults. However, there have been limited prospective evaluations of its diagnostic accuracy in children. Methods We enrolled children undergoing assessment for pulmonary TB in Kampala, Uganda, over a 12-month period. Children received a complete TB evaluation and were classified as Confirmed, Unconfirmed, or Unli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While when all the children with active TB were tested by MTB culture using three consecutive sputa, MTB culture on the second and third sputum detected an additional 24 cases with active TB. When using three MTB culture results as the reference, the sensitivities of Ultra and Xpert in children with culture-negative TB decreased to 28.9% and 13.5%, respectively, which is similar with the recently published data in children [21]. In addition, we observed the diagnostic efficiency using the combination of one single MTB culture and one single Ultra was equivalent to the combination of repeated MTB culture and one single Ultra.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While when all the children with active TB were tested by MTB culture using three consecutive sputa, MTB culture on the second and third sputum detected an additional 24 cases with active TB. When using three MTB culture results as the reference, the sensitivities of Ultra and Xpert in children with culture-negative TB decreased to 28.9% and 13.5%, respectively, which is similar with the recently published data in children [21]. In addition, we observed the diagnostic efficiency using the combination of one single MTB culture and one single Ultra was equivalent to the combination of repeated MTB culture and one single Ultra.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…26 Consistent with recently published study, considering the patients in our study had signs and symptoms of TB, have no previous TB disease, and all had clinical improvement after anti-TB treatment, the finding in our study supports the clinical diagnosis of active TB in children with trace results and also supports the notion that trace results can be considered to be truepositive results in children with clinical symptoms as previous reported studies. [26][27][28] As Ssengooba et al pointed out that it was challenge to accurately assess a novel diagnostic assay in the absence of gold standard. 27 For the children who were positive only by Xpert Ultra trace results, 1 of the explanations was that the samples may have a bacillary load too low to be detectable by culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not infrequently, such trace calls are associated with negative cultures if performed on the same samples, especially among recently treated patients, which is not commonly the case in children, raising the possibility of falsepositive results [33]. However, as paucibacillary TB is most common in high-risk patient groups, including children, HIV-infected individuals, and in extra-thoracic TB (such as TB meningitis), WHO has recommended that trace calls be regarded as microbiological confirmation in these high-risk groups [7,34]. Recently, TB symptoms, extra-pulmonary TB, and no prior TB have been identified as independently associated with culture-positive TB in adults and children with trace calls [35].…”
Section: Molecular Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%