2020
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective evaluation of the outcome of submucosal ligation of fistula tract

Abstract: Aim Fistula-in-ano (FIA) is an anomalous passage between perianal skin and the anal canal or the rectum that presents many management difficulties. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) was introduced as a cost-effective sphincter-saving procedure with a reported success rate of 94.4%. Unfortunately, this procedure is technically challenging, and recently submucosal ligation of fistula tract (SLOFT), a simplification of LIFT, was proposed. Our aim was to assess the SLOFT technique over a longer fol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Submucosal ligation of fistula tract (SLOFT), a modification of LIFT, is technically less difficult because it avoids dissection in the intersphincteric plane [26]. In an observational study of 47 patients undergoing SLOFT, the fistula closure success rate was 80.9% [27 ▪ ]. These data are encouraging and, given the greater simplicity of the approach compared to LIFT, might be considered as an alternative option to the LIFT procedure.…”
Section: Text Of Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submucosal ligation of fistula tract (SLOFT), a modification of LIFT, is technically less difficult because it avoids dissection in the intersphincteric plane [26]. In an observational study of 47 patients undergoing SLOFT, the fistula closure success rate was 80.9% [27 ▪ ]. These data are encouraging and, given the greater simplicity of the approach compared to LIFT, might be considered as an alternative option to the LIFT procedure.…”
Section: Text Of Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secure closure of the internal opening, disconnection of the tract and eradication of the distal tract are the governing principles of this procedure. While it is true that SLOFT does not tackle the sepsis within the intersphincteric tract, this was not reflected in the clinical outcome [3]. There are a variety of reasons for the failure of a sphincter sparing procedure including length of the tract, perianal collection and diabetes mellitus [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%