2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective development study of software-guided radio-frequency ablation of primary and secondary liver tumors: Clinical intervention modelling, planning and proof for ablation cancer treatment (ClinicIMPPACT)

Abstract: IntroductionRadio-frequency ablation (RFA) is a promising minimal-invasive treatment option for early liver cancer, however monitoring or predicting the size of the resulting tissue necrosis during the RFA-procedure is a challenging task, potentially resulting in a significant rate of under- or over treatments. Currently there is no reliable lesion size prediction method commercially available.ObjectivesClinicIMPPACT is designed as multicenter-, prospective-, non-randomized clinical trial to evaluate the accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the RFA Guardian is the center of a clinical trial 35 that evaluates whether peri-interventional prospective simulation could be feasible in the future. To ultimately achieve this goal, the focus of the ongoing study is to record the time required for simulating treatment using a real needle position, segmented from peri-interventional images and registered into the patient-specific model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the RFA Guardian is the center of a clinical trial 35 that evaluates whether peri-interventional prospective simulation could be feasible in the future. To ultimately achieve this goal, the focus of the ongoing study is to record the time required for simulating treatment using a real needle position, segmented from peri-interventional images and registered into the patient-specific model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case the resulting predicted coagulation area is unsatisfying, the IR can still adapt the treatment plan. This scenario, where treatment and simulation run in parallel, is currently being investigated in a clinical trial 35 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first retrospective study indicated that this approach has the potential to improve the classical RFA planning based on inspection of 2 D images alone [404]. Software-guided RFA of primary and secondary liver tumors is currently evaluated in the ClinicIMPPACT study; a multicenter-, prospective-, non-randomized clinical trial to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of innovative planning and simulation software [405]. MWA has the potential of creating larger ablation zones compared to RFA, but at the same time this yields a greater risk of thermal damage in surrounding healthy tissues, which explains the research interest in development of personalized MWA treatment planning [406].…”
Section: Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this issue and assist the clinicians in a better way, use of computer-assisted electrode trajectory planning techniques has also been extensively explored, particularly for reducing the number of re-insertion attempts (Seitel et al, 2011, Singh andRepaka, 2018d). Recently, (Zhang et al, 2019b) reported an extensive review on computer-assisted needle trajectory planning for RFA and Several studies have been reported in the past on the three-dimensional image-based patient-specific model of RFA for treating tumor (Audigier et al, 2017, Audigier et al, 2015, Audigier et al, 2013, Payne et al, 2010, Rieder et al, 2011, Chen et al, 2018, Reinhardt et al, 2017, Voglreiter et al, 2018, Zorbas and Samaras, 2014, Jin et al, 2014, Moche et al, 2020. Figure 6 presents a generalized technical workflow adopted during the patient-specific modelling and simulation of RFA for treating liver tumor (Voglreiter et al, 2018).…”
Section: Image-based Multiscale Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%