1992
DOI: 10.1136/gut.33.12.1675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective controlled study comparing brush and bile exfoliative cytology for diagnosing bile duct strictures.

Abstract: (16), bile duct cancer (nine), ampullary cancer (three) and metastases in (one)) and three were because of benign disease (sclerosing cholangitis, Mirizzi syndrome, and villous adenoma one each). The three patients with benign strictures all underwent surgery and had histological confirmation of benign disease. Of the 29 patients with malignancy histological confirmation was obtained in 16 patients. This was obtained from biopsies at operation, under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance, endoscopic retro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
4
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Transpapillary bile duct biopsy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a simple, safe, and effective way to biopsy these strictures. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] However, when biopsy fails to demonstrate malignancy, there are no clear guidelines for further management of these patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Transpapillary bile duct biopsy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a simple, safe, and effective way to biopsy these strictures. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] However, when biopsy fails to demonstrate malignancy, there are no clear guidelines for further management of these patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Regarding the diagnosis of CC, biliary cytology and brush cytology are performed routinely, although the sensitivity of exfoliative biliary cytology is generally low (40%-69%). [10][11][12] Thus, a novel biological diagnostic marker for CC is needed to provide a fully workable method to identify the lesion at as early a stage as possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,10,16,19,22 Most of the reported series have utilized a combination of these procedures and methods for cytologic evaluation. 6,11 Even in studies involving primarily the biliary tree by brushings, the specimens studied were cytocentrifuge preparations from brushes rather than direct smears. 4,18 In our study, all 175 cases were direct smears from the endoscopic brush.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%