2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective comparison of total protein/creatinine ratio versus 24-hour urine protein in women with suspected preeclampsia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] our data demonstrated a strong correlation between the two methods in pregnant women suspected of having pre-eclampsia. It suggests that the random urinary p:c ratio is an accurate test for discriminating between significant and insignificant proteinuria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous studies, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] our data demonstrated a strong correlation between the two methods in pregnant women suspected of having pre-eclampsia. It suggests that the random urinary p:c ratio is an accurate test for discriminating between significant and insignificant proteinuria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Several studies have suggested an acceptable correlation between single-voided p:c ratio and 24-h urine protein in pregnant patients. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Nevertheless, the results reported may be limited by examining patients with a different underling disease in one study 11 and not having a large enough sample in another one. 10 Some studies were conducted on hospitalised pregnant patients with suspected pre-eclampsia, whose results may not be applicable for outpatient pregnant women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteinuria is a criterion for diagnosis in the most widely accepted definitions of pre-eclampsia, but the threshold for significance remains controversial [1,2]. Recent guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for the management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy have highlighted that the prognostic value of different quantities of urinary protein is unclear and recommend research to identify diagnostic thresholds of proteinuria which are accurate in predicting clinically important outcomes, thus allowing interventions based on these thresholds to be evaluated in randomised controlled trials [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 However, there is no consensus regarding accuracy of protein/creatinine ratio in predictions of 300 mg of protein in 24-hour urine collection during pregnancy. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The standard practice of collecting a 24-hour urine for protein is cumbersome, time consuming, and inconvenient. Although many women with suspected preeclampsia are hospitalized, some women are managed as outpatients and collect a 24-hour urine sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%