1991
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90415-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A prospective comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy and marrow histology/cytology in neuroblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high rate of false-negative bone marrow metastases, which can be detected on MRI, on MIBG scintigraphy and poor specificity of MRI was reported by these authors [14,30,31]. These findings are consistent with our study findings-a relatively low sensitivity on MIBG scintigraphy and low specificity on MRI in detecting not only bone marrow metastases but also all neuroblastoma lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…A high rate of false-negative bone marrow metastases, which can be detected on MRI, on MIBG scintigraphy and poor specificity of MRI was reported by these authors [14,30,31]. These findings are consistent with our study findings-a relatively low sensitivity on MIBG scintigraphy and low specificity on MRI in detecting not only bone marrow metastases but also all neuroblastoma lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Should this be the case, patients who show negative uptake after induction may be a mixed group between very good and extremely poor responders. Whether magnetic resonance imaging might be more specific remains speculative [16]. The other bias of these studies is the dose of MIBG used and the duration and timing of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For metastases this is of great importance, because the presence of metastases classifies the patient as stage 4 or 4S and this has severe consequences for the prognosis and treatment. A possible candidate as add-on test might be 18 F-FDG-PET(-CT) or MRI (Corbett 1991b; Siegel 2013). In this Cochrane DTA review we reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-FDG-PET(-CT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%