2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02298.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposed system for documenting the functional outcome of paediatric laryngotracheal stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 22 articles describing 14 PROMs were included for data extraction. These PROMs included: the 10‐question swallowing index (31); the Airway‐Dyspnoea‐Voice‐Swallow scale and PROM (32,33); the Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS) (34,35); the Child and Oral Motor Proficiency Scale (ChOMPS) (36); Children’s Eating Behavior Inventory (CEBI) (37); Feeding and Swallowing Impact Scales (FS‐IS) (38); the Feeding Assessment Scale (39); the Feeding Impact Scales (40); the Four‐Item Measure of Texture Problems (41); the Parent Attribution for Child Eating Scale (42); the Pediatric Assessment Scale for Severe Feeding Problems (43); the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (Pedi‐EAT) (44); an unnamed PROM that investigates swallowing disorders in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (45); and the Sensory Eating Problems (SEP) Scale (46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 22 articles describing 14 PROMs were included for data extraction. These PROMs included: the 10‐question swallowing index (31); the Airway‐Dyspnoea‐Voice‐Swallow scale and PROM (32,33); the Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS) (34,35); the Child and Oral Motor Proficiency Scale (ChOMPS) (36); Children’s Eating Behavior Inventory (CEBI) (37); Feeding and Swallowing Impact Scales (FS‐IS) (38); the Feeding Assessment Scale (39); the Feeding Impact Scales (40); the Four‐Item Measure of Texture Problems (41); the Parent Attribution for Child Eating Scale (42); the Pediatric Assessment Scale for Severe Feeding Problems (43); the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (Pedi‐EAT) (44); an unnamed PROM that investigates swallowing disorders in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (45); and the Sensory Eating Problems (SEP) Scale (46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target population for the majority of PROMs included was nonspecific (n = 8, 57%), but some were intended for specific populations, including otherwise healthy children (45), children with medical and/or developmental disabilities (37), those with laryngotracheal stenosis (32,33), CHARGE syndrome (39), tube‐fed children (43), and for children following supraglottoplasty (31) (see Table 1). The included PROMs described either evaluative (ie, documenting or describing the feeding skills observed) or discriminative (ie, comparing outcomes to cut‐scores or age reference values) purposes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cotton‐Myer and McCaffrey grading systems for SGS were applied. Airway–Dyspnoea–Voice–Swallow (ADVS) Scale, and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Scale (Supplement 1) were for quality of life assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normative data suggest that an overall EAT-10 score of 3 or more is abnormal. ADVS assessment was carried out to evaluate a diseasespecific patient-reported outcome measure [19,20]. It is a proven system that portrays the functional outcome of adult and children laryngotracheal stenosis.…”
Section: Quality-of-life Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%