2013
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposed model for prediction of survival based on a follow-up study in unresectable pancreatic cancer

Abstract: ObjectivesTo define an easy-to-use model for prediction of survival time in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer in order to optimise patient' care.DesignAn observational retrospective study on patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The initial radiographs at presentation of symptoms were reviewed and the maximum diameter of the primary tumour was determined. The occurrence of liver metastases and performance status that determines initiation of chemotherapy was also used in the regression analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumour size is one of the most important staging criteria and prognostic indicators in pancreatic cancer. [53][54][55][56][57][58] Studies have shown increased tumour size is associated with metastases not identified on pre-operative CT. Yoshida et al reported patients with resectable disease at laparotomy had a mean tumour size of 3.1 cm, compared to 4.4 cm in patients with metastatic disease (p < 0.005). 59 Similarly, Morganti and co-workers observed patients (n = 54) with a tumour size >3 cm had significantly more metastases at exploration compared to patients with tumours <3 cm (22% versus 0%, respectively; p < 0.01).…”
Section: Tumour Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumour size is one of the most important staging criteria and prognostic indicators in pancreatic cancer. [53][54][55][56][57][58] Studies have shown increased tumour size is associated with metastases not identified on pre-operative CT. Yoshida et al reported patients with resectable disease at laparotomy had a mean tumour size of 3.1 cm, compared to 4.4 cm in patients with metastatic disease (p < 0.005). 59 Similarly, Morganti and co-workers observed patients (n = 54) with a tumour size >3 cm had significantly more metastases at exploration compared to patients with tumours <3 cm (22% versus 0%, respectively; p < 0.01).…”
Section: Tumour Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PDAC, these models have been focused mainly on patients with localized disease. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The limited number of models that included patients with advanced disease were based on a small number of patients, 15 developed for specific patient groups (eg, patients after firstline systemic treatment 16 or treated with gemcitabine-based regimens [17][18][19] ), based on patients included in trials only, 19,20 limited to patients with locally advanced disease, 17,21 or only described together with patients with localized diasease. 22 Moreover, they all did not take into account the different palliative systemic treatment options that are currently available for PDAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 ] Several studies showed that the presence of hepatic metastasis is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with metastatic PDAC. [ 8 10 ] Recently, 1 autopsy study for patterns of failure in patients with PDAC suggested that it is classified to limited versus extensive metastasis according to the tumor burden in the metastatic setting. [ 11 ] Some studies showed that increased IL-6 or IL-8 serum level is associated with the presence of hepatic metastasis and shorter survival in patients with PDAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%