Abstract:This model identifies mentoring practices that empower protégés to engage in developmental behaviors that will help them become the best physicians possible. Educators may use this model to develop training tools to teach attendings how to create an optimal mentoring environment. Researchers can use the model to help guide their future investigations of mentoring in medicine.
“…Overall, the ideal mentorship model remains unclear and likely varies according to unique specialty needs. 3,19 The literature shows that female residents and faculty report a desire for female mentors, and our study results are consistent with this observation. 13,20,21 Gender concordance has been found to lead to better mentorship relationships, 20 but it can be difficult to achieve since females may have more difficulty identifying mentors than their male colleagues (e.g., only 27% of mentors were female in our survey).…”
“…Overall, the ideal mentorship model remains unclear and likely varies according to unique specialty needs. 3,19 The literature shows that female residents and faculty report a desire for female mentors, and our study results are consistent with this observation. 13,20,21 Gender concordance has been found to lead to better mentorship relationships, 20 but it can be difficult to achieve since females may have more difficulty identifying mentors than their male colleagues (e.g., only 27% of mentors were female in our survey).…”
“…Like any effective mentor-mentee arrangement [3], we deeply respected one another's work, shared common values, communicated regularly and without reservation, were accountable to one another, and had a personal connection. Other attributes to consider when choosing a mentor include their availability, track record in mentoring other trainees to success, their willingness to challenge you to expand your goals, to take appropriate risks, and to think both critically and creatively.…”
Fellows in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility training are expected to complete 18 months of clinical, basic, or epidemiological research. The goal of this research is not only to provide the basis for the thesis section of the oral board exam but also to spark interest in reproductive medicine research and to provide the next generation of physician-scientists with a foundational experience in research design and implementation. Incoming fellows often have varying degrees of training in research methodology and, likewise, different career goals. Ideally, selection of a thesis topic and mentor should be geared toward defining an Banswerableq uestion and building a practical skill set for future investigation. This contribution to the JARG Young Investigator's Forum revisits the steps of the scientific method through the lens of one recently graduated fellow and his project aimed to test the hypothesis that Bsequential oxygen exposure (5% from days 1 to 3, then 2% from days 3 to 5) improves blastocyst yield and quality compared to continuous exposure to 5% oxygen among human preimplantation embryos.K
“…In keeping with Braun and Clarke's approach, descriptions captured within the semantic themes are presented in the results section and are only analyzed and interpreted in the discussion segment of the paper [38].…”
Section: Data Extraction Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic themes were identified from 'detail rich' codes focused upon the various aspects of the mentoring process [38]. In keeping with Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis, themes were constructed from the 'surface' meaning of the data [38].…”
Background: Mentoring in Palliative Medicine is critical to training, career satisfaction and professional development. Yet, there are no accounts of effective mentoring programs in Palliative Medicine. This gap is attributed to a failure to define mentoring practice and a lack of acknowledgment of mentoring's context-specific, goal-sensitive, mentee-, mentor-and organizational-dependent nature that has hindered effective review of mentoring programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.