2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2010.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposed methodology for analysis of ground settlements caused by tunneling, with particular reference to the “buoyancy” effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analytical solutions for ground settlement caused by tunnel construction in initially isotropic and homogeneous soils [28] The analytical solution of the uniform elastic half-space tunnel is performed using the approximation method suggested by Sasageta [28]. [29] Numerical Methods FEM (PLAXIS 3D, ABAQUS) [30][31][32][33][34]] FDM (FLAC3D) [35][36][37][38]] DEM (3DEC) [39][40][41][42][43] Note: S = theoretical settlement (m); Smax = maximum settlement (m); i = point of inflexion (m); x = transverse horizontal distance from the tunnel center line (m); A = tunnel axis depth (m); D = equivalent tunnel excavation diameter (m); C = empirical coefficient; VL = volume loss; E = elasticity modulus; γ n = natural unit weight; σ s = surface surcharge (kPa); σ T = required working face support pressure (kPa); Ucs = undrained cohesion of soil.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical solutions for ground settlement caused by tunnel construction in initially isotropic and homogeneous soils [28] The analytical solution of the uniform elastic half-space tunnel is performed using the approximation method suggested by Sasageta [28]. [29] Numerical Methods FEM (PLAXIS 3D, ABAQUS) [30][31][32][33][34]] FDM (FLAC3D) [35][36][37][38]] DEM (3DEC) [39][40][41][42][43] Note: S = theoretical settlement (m); Smax = maximum settlement (m); i = point of inflexion (m); x = transverse horizontal distance from the tunnel center line (m); A = tunnel axis depth (m); D = equivalent tunnel excavation diameter (m); C = empirical coefficient; VL = volume loss; E = elasticity modulus; γ n = natural unit weight; σ s = surface surcharge (kPa); σ T = required working face support pressure (kPa); Ucs = undrained cohesion of soil.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the number of parameters and elements for finite element analysis of tunnel space is huge, only a more actual simulation for the coupling treatment of soil and tunnel structure interface can ensure the calculation results be reliable. Otherwise, the deviation of settlement estimated by the finite element method will be large [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many engineers and researchers have spent a lot of time on this task in order to finish it successfully (Boscardin and Cording 1989, ZC, Liao et al 1994, Urbain 1997, Law 2001, Franzius 2003, Centis and Giacomin 2004, Bhalla, Yang et al 2005, Kontogianni and Stiros 2005, van der Poel, Gastine et al 2006, Berkelaar, Huisman et al 2007, de Rienzo, Oreste et al 2008, Standing and Burland 2008, Chen, Zhu et al 2011, Hisatake 2011, Mananjara 2011, Ghorbani, Sharifzadeh et al 2012, Salimi, Esmaeili et al 2013, Zhang, Chen et al 2013, Zhang, Wu et al 2014.…”
Section: Current Practice In Building Monitoring During Underground Workmentioning
confidence: 99%