2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom–Up and Top–Down approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
127
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
127
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no ex vivo and in vitro test methods have the performance to replace fully the Draize‐EIT that has been adopted for regulatory purposes. Therefore, a tiered approach of combining several test methods that used different complementary indicators was proposed (Scott et al ., 2010). In ex vivo test methods such as the bovine corneal opacity permeability and isolated chicken eye tests, the degree of tissue damage based on change in corneal opacity, corneal permeability of fluorescein and thickness of cornea was utilized as an indicator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no ex vivo and in vitro test methods have the performance to replace fully the Draize‐EIT that has been adopted for regulatory purposes. Therefore, a tiered approach of combining several test methods that used different complementary indicators was proposed (Scott et al ., 2010). In ex vivo test methods such as the bovine corneal opacity permeability and isolated chicken eye tests, the degree of tissue damage based on change in corneal opacity, corneal permeability of fluorescein and thickness of cornea was utilized as an indicator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of alternative methods is still desirable no single assay being able to correctly predict the full spectrum of the UN GHS categories (Cat 1, serious, irreversible eye damage vs. Cat 2A, 2B reversible eye irritation) and thus, cannot fully replace the in vivo Draize eye irritation test (Lotz et al, 2016). Therefore, the combination of the BCOP assay with other internationally accepted test methods in a tiered testing strategy is suggested to allow the detailed and structured investigation of eye irritation potential that might be implemented in future (Kolle et al, 2016;Scott et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tiered approach of several in vitro assays combined was proposed in order to estimate the irritation potential for a wide range of chemical classes (Hagino et al, 2008;Mc Namee et al, 2009;Scott et al, 2009). For these reasons, ECVAM conducted a retrospective validation of cytotoxicity or cell function based assays (Neutral Red Release: NRR, Red Blood Cell: RBC, Fluorescein Leakage: FL, Cytocensor Microphysiometer: CM) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%