2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4993-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposed Decision-Making Model to Prioritize Building Elements Maintenance Actions Toward Achieving Sustainability in Community Buildings in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms the asset management maturity steps discussed earlier in the chapter (see Figure 2-10). Previous research extensively addresses decision-making tools on the refurbishment of building assets (Kalutara et al, 2011). According to the CRC report on delivering a re-life project (Carlyle et al), two main assessment criteria are identified in the assessment of these tools.…”
Section: Decision-making Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms the asset management maturity steps discussed earlier in the chapter (see Figure 2-10). Previous research extensively addresses decision-making tools on the refurbishment of building assets (Kalutara et al, 2011). According to the CRC report on delivering a re-life project (Carlyle et al), two main assessment criteria are identified in the assessment of these tools.…”
Section: Decision-making Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these tools are useful valid tools for deciding on retrofitting of buildings, some shortcomings of these tools must be addressed to make them more reliable. Although most models have a multi-criteria basis in their assessments (which will be discussed in the next category of decision-making), the final criterion which is considered in the assessment decision is made based solely on cost (Kalutara et al, 2011).…”
Section: Decision-making Based On Financial Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%