2016
DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposed Approach for Idea Selection in Front End of Innovation Activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pekka Buttler (Valgeirsdottir & Onarheim, 2017); innovation begins with creativity (Serrat, 2017); and creativity is "thinking", whereas implementation is "doing" (West, 2002), with the most promising ideas being selected for implementation (Forde & Fox, 2016). Significantly, Cummings, Bilton, and ogilvie (2015) argue for conceptualizing creativity not as normative, singular, and static, but as pluralistic ("creativities") and as dynamic ("creativitying").…”
Section: A Practice Methods For Studying Creative Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pekka Buttler (Valgeirsdottir & Onarheim, 2017); innovation begins with creativity (Serrat, 2017); and creativity is "thinking", whereas implementation is "doing" (West, 2002), with the most promising ideas being selected for implementation (Forde & Fox, 2016). Significantly, Cummings, Bilton, and ogilvie (2015) argue for conceptualizing creativity not as normative, singular, and static, but as pluralistic ("creativities") and as dynamic ("creativitying").…”
Section: A Practice Methods For Studying Creative Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides outlining the method, I also present results from a research project utilizing the PMSCC, showing how the method can produce worthwhile findings, foster new insights, and help practitioners hone their creative processes. (Valgeirsdottir & Onarheim, 2017); innovation begins with creativity (Serrat, 2017); and creativity is "thinking", whereas implementation is "doing" (West, 2002), with the most promising ideas being selected for implementation (Forde & Fox, 2016). Significantly, Cummings, Bilton, and ogilvie (2015) argue for conceptualizing creativity not as normative, singular, and static, but as pluralistic ("creativities") and as dynamic ("creativitying").…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the creative spark should be novel and relevant. The evaluation of creative ideas and automatic approaches to generate them are currently an open issue in the artificial intelligence (AI) research field as discussed by Forde and Fox [13] and Lamb et al [8]. One of these approaches is computational creativity that is a subfield of AI research aimed at building and working with computational systems that create artefacts and ideas [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%