2015
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2014.2347218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposal for the Management of the Measurement Uncertainty in Classification and Recognition Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more detail, the decision algorithm (see Figure 6) is composed by three steps [23], [25]: -STEP A: for each subject, j , present in the database, the measured Score, S j , is used together with the corresponding uncertainty, u S , in order to evaluate the probability, P j , that the input subject is the subject j. In particular, P j represents the probability that the Score of the j-th subject is equal to zero given a measured value (S j ), considering the score as a random variable (see Figure 6), whose standard deviation is equal to u S [25]; b) Figure 5. Definition of Wk: a) Images acquired by Camera 1 for subject #1, b) Scores evolution (the first image of the subject is used as reference).…”
Section: Classification Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In more detail, the decision algorithm (see Figure 6) is composed by three steps [23], [25]: -STEP A: for each subject, j , present in the database, the measured Score, S j , is used together with the corresponding uncertainty, u S , in order to evaluate the probability, P j , that the input subject is the subject j. In particular, P j represents the probability that the Score of the j-th subject is equal to zero given a measured value (S j ), considering the score as a random variable (see Figure 6), whose standard deviation is equal to u S [25]; b) Figure 5. Definition of Wk: a) Images acquired by Camera 1 for subject #1, b) Scores evolution (the first image of the subject is used as reference).…”
Section: Classification Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental activity demonstrated that the performance of these kinds of systems depends on several aspects from image acquisition to the classification procedure through the biometrical algorithm. The quantification of these uncertainty contributions lead the authors to formulate an original classification method which was able to improve the classification performance with respect to traditional scorebased approaches [25], [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aim of managing the measurement uncertainty for obtain a more reliable classification a new scheme was proposed in [13], [14] (see Figure 2): -At first, the two 2D images of the unknown subject are processed by the biometric algorithm and the Score, S i (i=1,..,N), of each of the N subjects of the database is evaluated. -…”
Section: The Classification Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method is based on a probabilistic approach for the evaluation of the confidence level of system outputs and the suitable use of this information for a performance improvement in terms of correct decision rate. In this way, the proposed method allows achieving a more reliable classification procedure with respect to a basic approach [14]. As cases study, it was applied to a 2D face classification algorithm based on Linear Discrimination Analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%