Computers in Cardiology, 2004
DOI: 10.1109/cic.2004.1443010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposal for structured diagnosis reporting in echocardiography, using a DICOM compliant environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the context groups and templates described in the DICOM supplement 72 and we extended them in order to be able to report description sections and also to achieve a more comprehensive format. In a previous paper we reported a specific LV template appropriate for the complexity of ventricular echocardiografic examination (9). We are able now to generate in our software environment reports for every type of echocardiographic pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We used the context groups and templates described in the DICOM supplement 72 and we extended them in order to be able to report description sections and also to achieve a more comprehensive format. In a previous paper we reported a specific LV template appropriate for the complexity of ventricular echocardiografic examination (9). We are able now to generate in our software environment reports for every type of echocardiographic pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some rules governing Structured reporting are described in DICOM standard and in supplements (5,8). Recently we developed a specific application that allows to code echocardiographic concepts, to group them into context groups and construct templates which finally will lead to structured report generation (9). We used the context groups and templates described in the DICOM supplement 72 and we extended them in order to be able to report description sections and also to achieve a more comprehensive format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations