2014
DOI: 10.3390/s140711557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposal for Automatic Fruit Harvesting by Combining a Low Cost Stereovision Camera and a Robotic Arm

Abstract: This paper proposes the development of an automatic fruit harvesting system by combining a low cost stereovision camera and a robotic arm placed in the gripper tool. The stereovision camera is used to estimate the size, distance and position of the fruits whereas the robotic arm is used to mechanically pickup the fruits. The low cost stereovision system has been tested in laboratory conditions with a reference small object, an apple and a pear at 10 different intermediate distances from the camera. The average… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The major challenges in localizing fruit are the displacement of fruit by wind or other factors during imaging, and occlusion of fruit (Sarig, 1993). Numerous studies have been carried out to locate fruit in tree canopies with reasonable successes (Harrell et al, , 1990Slaughter and Harrell, 1989;Whittaker et al, 1987;Kondo and Kawamura, 1983;Mehta and Burks, 2014;Font et al, 2014). The sensors and methods used in the past for fruit localization in the agricultural environment are critically reviewed in the following sub-sections.…”
Section: Sensors and Systems For Fruit Localizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major challenges in localizing fruit are the displacement of fruit by wind or other factors during imaging, and occlusion of fruit (Sarig, 1993). Numerous studies have been carried out to locate fruit in tree canopies with reasonable successes (Harrell et al, , 1990Slaughter and Harrell, 1989;Whittaker et al, 1987;Kondo and Kawamura, 1983;Mehta and Burks, 2014;Font et al, 2014). The sensors and methods used in the past for fruit localization in the agricultural environment are critically reviewed in the following sub-sections.…”
Section: Sensors and Systems For Fruit Localizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Image disparity is then converted to distance to objects from the camera using relative camera locations and orientations, and focal lengths of the cameras (Shapiro and Stockman, 2001). Researchers have widely used this method to simultaneously identify and locate fruit for harvesting or crop-load estimation (Font et al, 2014;Tanigaki et al, 2008;Kitamura and Oka, 2005). Plebe and Grasso (2001) installed stereo cameras in two arms of an orange harvesting robot.…”
Section: Stereovisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jimenez et al [4] adopted a laser-based computer vision system for fruit detection, which is based on an infrared laser range-finder sensor that provides range and reflectance images. Wang et al [5] and Font et al [6] used a binocular stereo vision to recognize and locate fruits in an unstructured environment with varying illumination. To detect apples in the canopy, Feng et al [7] designed a machine vision system consisting of a time-of-flight (ToF) camera and a digital color charge coupled device (CCD) camera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the calculated movement duration of the end-effector, it can eliminate the time waiting for the oscillation to decay. Font et al (2014) also investigated a vision control strategy by combining open-loop visual control and visual closed-loop control. A stereovision camera mounted on a robot arm could acquire the initial fruit location.…”
Section: Open-loop Visual Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%