2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-014-0207-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proposal for a primary screening tool: `Keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’

Abstract: BackgroundThere is now overwhelming scientific evidence that central obesity, as opposed to total obesity assessed by body mass index (BMI), is associated with the most health risks and that the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is a simple proxy for this central fat distribution. This Opinion reviews the evidence for the use of WHtR to predict mortality and for its association with morbidity. A boundary value of WHtR of 0.5 has been proposed and become widely used. This translates into the simple screening message… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
150
3
15

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
150
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well recognized that WHtR is a good predictor for morbidity and mortality (28). Even though BMI is commonly used as a measure of overall adiposity and classify risk level to various chronic illnesses (29,32), growing evidence suggests that a central (abdominal) fat distribution pattern, evidenced by a higher waist circumference or WHtR, might be a better measure of risk (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well recognized that WHtR is a good predictor for morbidity and mortality (28). Even though BMI is commonly used as a measure of overall adiposity and classify risk level to various chronic illnesses (29,32), growing evidence suggests that a central (abdominal) fat distribution pattern, evidenced by a higher waist circumference or WHtR, might be a better measure of risk (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] This boundary value has Strengths and limitations of this study ▪ The use of the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) addresses a current dilemma of how best to identify 'early health risk' with a very simple, low cost, anthropometric measure. ▪ The predictive value of WHtR is backed by systematic reviews and meta-analyses in many different populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bel/boy oranının abdominal obezite ve hastalık riskleri ile olan ilişkisi ilk kez 1990'lı yıllarda öne çıkmıştır. Bel/boy oranı ile ilgili son yıllarda yapı-lan çalışmalar, bel/boy oranının BKİ, bel çevresi ve bel/kalça oranına göre kardiyometabolik risk ile tip 2 diyabet riskinin belirlenmesinde daha iyi bir ölçüm olduğu üzerinde durmaktadır (Ashwell, Gunn, & Gibson, 2012;Savva, Lamnisos, & Kafatos, 2013;Ashwell & Gibson, 2014;Bohr, Laurson, & McQueen, 2016). Tip 2 diyabet risk faktörleri ve risk grupları ile ilgili yapılan bir ça-lışmada abdominal obezite ve sedanter yaşam tarzı risk faktörleriyle ilgili olarak hemşirelerde tip 2 diyabet riskinin diğer sağlık profesyonellerine kı-yasla daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (Almeida, Zanetti, Almeida, & Damasceno, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified