2018
DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A propensity score‐matched comparison of biodegradable polymer vs second‐generation durable polymer drug‐eluting stents in a real‐world population

Abstract: Efficacy and safety of BP-DES were not better than DP-DES at one-year follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were predominantly males (82%), 57% had acute MI, and 77% had complex lesions as defined by B2/C American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion class . The baseline characteristics of the patients which have been published elsewhere are provided in Table . Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the relative risk of events that was expressed as hazard ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were predominantly males (82%), 57% had acute MI, and 77% had complex lesions as defined by B2/C American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion class . The baseline characteristics of the patients which have been published elsewhere are provided in Table . Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the relative risk of events that was expressed as hazard ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%