2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A propensity-matched study of the association of physical function and outcomes in geriatric heart failure

Abstract: Most heart failure (HF) patients are older adults. However, the association of functional status and outcomes in ambulatory older adults with chronic HF has not been well studied. Of the 7788 Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial participants, 4036 were ≥65 years. Of these, 1369 (34%) had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV symptoms. We calculated propensity scores for NYHA III-IV symptoms for all 4036 patients using a non-parsimonious logistic regression model. We used propensity scores to matc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because propensity-matched studies can be conduced in a cost-efficient manner, these studies can be used to derive evidence for elderly patients [2, 4, 5]. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the long-term effects of low serum potassium on mortality and hospitalization in a cohort of propensity score matched chronic systolic and diastolic HF patients 65 years of age or older.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because propensity-matched studies can be conduced in a cost-efficient manner, these studies can be used to derive evidence for elderly patients [2, 4, 5]. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the long-term effects of low serum potassium on mortality and hospitalization in a cohort of propensity score matched chronic systolic and diastolic HF patients 65 years of age or older.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we used a non-parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model to calculate, for each patient, a propensity score for having age ≥65 years (Ahmed, 2008; Ahmed et al, 2006a,b; Ahmed et al, 2007a,b; Rosenbaum and Rubin, 1983; Rosenbaum and Rubin, 1984; Rubin, 1997; Rubin, 2001; Rubin, 2004). In the model, age ≥65 years was used as the dependent variable, and all covariates shown in Table 1, with the exception of estimated glomerular filtration rate (Levey et al, 1999) and chronic kidney disease (derived values), were entered as covariates into the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although propensity scores are often used to match baseline characteristics between two treatment groups in an observational study, the method can also be used to match baseline characteristics between two groups of patients based on comorbidities or other characteristics such as age or race (Ahmed, 2008; Ahmed et al, 2006a,b; Ahmed et al, 2007a,b). Using an SPSS macro and a greedy matching protocol, each patient ≥65 years of age was matched with a younger patient based on propensity score (Levesque, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated propensity scores for smoking for each of the 4060 patients using a non-parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model (Ahmed et al, 2006a,b, 2007, 2008; Ahmed and Aronow, 2008; Alper et al, 2009; Ekundayo et al, 2009a,b; Wahle et al, 2009, Bowling et al, 2010). In the model, we used baseline smoking as the dependent variable, and 46 other baseline characteristics displayed in Figure 1 were entered as covariates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%