2017
DOI: 10.1090/jams/893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proof of the shuffle conjecture

Abstract: We present a proof of the compositional shuffle conjecture [HMZ12], which generalizes the famous shuffle conjecture for the character of the diagonal coinvariant algebra [HHL`05b]. We first formulate the combinatorial side of the conjecture in terms of certain operators on a graded vector space V˚whose degree zero part is the ring of symmetric functions SymrXs over Qpq, tq. We then extend these operators to an action of an algebraà acting on this space, and interpret the right generalization of the ∇ using an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
233
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
233
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the touch composition is We can now state the compositional shuffle conjecture of Haglund, Morse and Zabrocki [16,Conjecture 4.5], which was proved by Carlsson and Mellit [6,Theorem 7.5]. ∇C α = π∈P Fn touch(π)=α t area(π) q dinv(π) F n,ides (π) Observe that proving this would immediately prove the shuffle conjecture since if we sum over all α n, then the left-hand side would yield ∇e n by Equation (3.4) and the right-hand side would lose its touch composition restriction.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then the touch composition is We can now state the compositional shuffle conjecture of Haglund, Morse and Zabrocki [16,Conjecture 4.5], which was proved by Carlsson and Mellit [6,Theorem 7.5]. ∇C α = π∈P Fn touch(π)=α t area(π) q dinv(π) F n,ides (π) Observe that proving this would immediately prove the shuffle conjecture since if we sum over all α n, then the left-hand side would yield ∇e n by Equation (3.4) and the right-hand side would lose its touch composition restriction.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On 25 August 2015 Carlsson and Mellit posted an article on the arXiv [5] titled simply "A proof of the shuffle conjecture", in which they proved the compositional shuffle conjecture, which in turn proved the shuffle conjecture. In their proof they refined the compositional shuffle conjecture yet further and proved this refinement.…”
Section: The Proof and Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [CM18] these operators are called ∆ uv , but we changed the notation in order to avoid confusion with the Delta operators ∆ f defined on Λ.…”
Section: Dyck Path Algebra Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the T i are invertible operators (see [CM18,Section 4] for an explicit formula of the inverse). For k ≥ 0, we define the operators…”
Section: Dyck Path Algebra Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation