2005
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A proof of a conjecture of Buck, Chan, and Robbins on the expected value of the minimum assignment

Abstract: ABSTRACT:We prove the main conjecture of the paper "On the expected value of the minimum assignment" by Marshall W. Buck, Clara S. Chan, and David P. Robbins [Random Structures Algorithms 21 (2002), 33-58]. This is an exact formula for the expected value of a certain type of random assignment problem. It generalizes the formula 1 + 1/4 + · · · + 1/n 2 for the n by n exp(1) random assignment problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, if we let a = [a i ] and b = [b j ] be column vectors, then the rate matrix for the costs is of rank 1 and is of the form ab T . This conjecture has been subsequently established in [24] by Wästlund using a modification of the argument in [14].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In other words, if we let a = [a i ] and b = [b j ] be column vectors, then the rate matrix for the costs is of rank 1 and is of the form ab T . This conjecture has been subsequently established in [24] by Wästlund using a modification of the argument in [14].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Generalizing (9) to the case of matrix C comprised of either zeros or independent random variables distributed exponentially with parame- Wästlund (2005a) has validated the BuckChan-Robbins conjecture (8) as well. 4…”
Section: Minimum K-assignment and Coppersmith-sorkin And Buck-chan-romentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Equation (46) is a generalization of the formula conjectured by Buck, Chan and Robbins [14] and proved in [47]. It can be established by following the same route as the proof of Theorem 7.3 in §7, but we shall give a different proof, generalizing to higher moments.…”
Section: Interpretation In Terms Of the Urn Processmentioning
confidence: 96%