2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A promising new on-line method of tar quantification by mass spectrometry during steam gasification of biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… A) breath sampler with disposable cardboard mouthpiece and the pushrod; B) connect the pushrod to the sampler and flush the sampler by pulling and pushing the rod in and out two or three times; C) remove to rod and connect the disposable mouthpiece to the sampler, placing the glass vial on the other side; D) have the patient breath normally and then keep exhaling trough the mouthpiece until their lungs are emptied; E) crimp airtight the glass vial with the appropriate crimp cap; F) throw away disposable mouthpiece and clean the breath sampler by flushing it two/three times using the pushrod; G) the glass vial, preserved at –20°C, is analyzed with the IMR-MS method, schematized here (reported from Defoort and colleagues [ 35 ]) and described in detail in Hornuss and colleagues [ 36 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A) breath sampler with disposable cardboard mouthpiece and the pushrod; B) connect the pushrod to the sampler and flush the sampler by pulling and pushing the rod in and out two or three times; C) remove to rod and connect the disposable mouthpiece to the sampler, placing the glass vial on the other side; D) have the patient breath normally and then keep exhaling trough the mouthpiece until their lungs are emptied; E) crimp airtight the glass vial with the appropriate crimp cap; F) throw away disposable mouthpiece and clean the breath sampler by flushing it two/three times using the pushrod; G) the glass vial, preserved at –20°C, is analyzed with the IMR-MS method, schematized here (reported from Defoort and colleagues [ 35 ]) and described in detail in Hornuss and colleagues [ 36 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naphthalene has two rings and presented as dominant compound results through gasification processes in the reactor (12), therefore threshold power to excite was measured to have information not only about the excitation wavelengths, but also the lowest power required to obtain fluorescence emission (17,18). Naphthalene has high absorption peak at a wavelength of 266 nm, and thus was excited with this wavelength at various excitation powers as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the reaction path and reaction mechanism of bio-gas (CO + H 2 ) to bio-aromatics have become more transparent. And recent studies have shown that a dual-functional catalyst system composed of metal and their oxides and zeolite can directly convert bio-gas into bio-aromatics. It is reported that iron-based FT catalysts can convert bio-gas to short olefins and copper-based catalysts can produce methanol/dimethyl ether intermediates in the MTA route. To further improve the conversion efficiency of olefins/methanol to bio-aromatics over the iron-/copper-based catalyst, it can be combined with a solid acid such as HZSM-5 zeolites in a single reactor. For example, Ding et al. , successfully combined iron-based catalysts with an HZSM-5 zeolite to convert bio-gas with high CO conversion (85%) and bio-aromatics selectivity (70% in C 5 + ).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Bio-aromatics Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%