2017
DOI: 10.5888/pcd14.160409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Project to Promote Adherence to Blood Pressure Medication Among People Who Use Community Pharmacies in Rural Montana, 2014–2016

Abstract: IntroductionPharmacists can assist patients in managing their blood pressure levels. We assessed whether adherence to blood pressure medication improved among people who used community pharmacies in rural Montana after pharmacists initiated consultations and distributed educational materials developed for the Million Hearts Initiative’s “Team Up. Pressure Down.” (TUPD) program.MethodsFrom 2014 to 2016, the Cardiovascular Health Program at the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services conducted a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… “Missing” “Missing” Strengths Blinding of data analysts Allocation concealment Low inter-rater Pharmacists received program training Minimal group contamination (cluster sampling) Randomisation Limitations Findings limited to chain pharmacies No blinding Smaller sample size Clinical & humanistic (favorable) Okada et al (2017), Japan [ 55 ] CRT, random Hypertensive patients (125) “Missing,” hypertension Lifestyle counseling Self-care management Regular follow-up & monitoring “Missing” “Missing” Strengths Pharmacists received program training Participants received validated BP monitors Minimal group contamination (cluster sampling) Randomization Limitations Patient self-reported data Smaller sample size Differences in groups’ baseline data. Clinical (favourable) & humanistic (unfavorable) Olenak & Calpin (2010), USA [ 56 ] Cross-sectional, convenience Subjects without CHD history (239) “Missing,” metabolic syndrome CVD risk screening Lifestyle counseling Smoking cessation “Missing” Patients perceived community pharmacist’s screening program as satisfactory Strengths Participation not restricted to pharmacy patients Use of point-of-care device Limitations Women-dominated sample Patient self-reported data Convenience sampling Single state Free program might have encouraged participation Clinical & humanistic (favorable) Oser et al (2017), USA [ 57 ] Before-after uncontrolled, purposive Patients on hypertensive medication (534) “Missing,” hypertension Adherence support Regular follow-up & monitoring Lifestyle counseling Referrals Medication management “Missing” “Missing” Strengths Pharmacists received program training All eligible pharmacies were invited to participate Limitations No compara...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… “Missing” “Missing” Strengths Blinding of data analysts Allocation concealment Low inter-rater Pharmacists received program training Minimal group contamination (cluster sampling) Randomisation Limitations Findings limited to chain pharmacies No blinding Smaller sample size Clinical & humanistic (favorable) Okada et al (2017), Japan [ 55 ] CRT, random Hypertensive patients (125) “Missing,” hypertension Lifestyle counseling Self-care management Regular follow-up & monitoring “Missing” “Missing” Strengths Pharmacists received program training Participants received validated BP monitors Minimal group contamination (cluster sampling) Randomization Limitations Patient self-reported data Smaller sample size Differences in groups’ baseline data. Clinical (favourable) & humanistic (unfavorable) Olenak & Calpin (2010), USA [ 56 ] Cross-sectional, convenience Subjects without CHD history (239) “Missing,” metabolic syndrome CVD risk screening Lifestyle counseling Smoking cessation “Missing” Patients perceived community pharmacist’s screening program as satisfactory Strengths Participation not restricted to pharmacy patients Use of point-of-care device Limitations Women-dominated sample Patient self-reported data Convenience sampling Single state Free program might have encouraged participation Clinical & humanistic (favorable) Oser et al (2017), USA [ 57 ] Before-after uncontrolled, purposive Patients on hypertensive medication (534) “Missing,” hypertension Adherence support Regular follow-up & monitoring Lifestyle counseling Referrals Medication management “Missing” “Missing” Strengths Pharmacists received program training All eligible pharmacies were invited to participate Limitations No compara...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervensi yang dilakukan oleh apoteker dalam bentuk konsultasi terhadap pasien dimana apoteker mendiskusikan tentang manajemen pengobatan yang akan dijalani oleh pasien termasuk perubahan gaya hidup. Apoteker juga memberikan kepada pasien beberapa materi yang terkait dengan pengobatan pasien (Carrie et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Oser et al describe how the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services used SPHA-1305 funding to conduct an evaluation of a 3-year intervention among 25 community pharmacies in rural areas to improve adherence to blood pressure medication ( 16 ). In addition to patient-level data, Montana also implemented a statewide survey of pharmacists and identified barriers perceived from the pharmacy point of view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%