2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding this issue, what is the maximum duration the group No-Timeout (which increments the criterion in steps) can achieve? Gulotta and Byrne (2015) showed…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding this issue, what is the maximum duration the group No-Timeout (which increments the criterion in steps) can achieve? Gulotta and Byrne (2015) showed…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding this issue, what is the maximum duration the group No-Timeout (which increments the criterion in steps) can achieve? Gulotta and Byrne (2015) showed that animals were able to keep a lever pressed for about 20 s. And, as argued above, such long responses would not occur in a Fixed protocol. Consequently, there is probably an intermediate protocol, perhaps a combination of the No-Timeout and Fixed, that would generate faster learning of longer responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…After evaluating post-IA operant self-administration, we tested rats on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement to investigate motivation to obtain alcohol (301,322). We found that rats were slightly more motivated to work for and consume mildly more alcohol after exposure to the IA procedure as reflected by the breakpoint and intake value which was significantly higher compared to the controls.…”
Section: Intermittent Access To Alcohol Resulted In Escalated Alcoholmentioning
confidence: 96%