2000
DOI: 10.1109/13.848075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A programming learning system for beginners-a completion strategy approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the student's programming solution can then be one of four states: (1) syntactically correct and semantically correct, (2) syntactically correct and semantically incorrect, (3) syntactically incorrect and semantically correct, and (4) syntactically incorrect and semantically incorrect [19]. Many programming instruction systems tend to detect syntactic and semantic errors in the programs submitted by students and indicate where and why the errors occur in the programs [11]. One study developed a Web‐based Java Programming Learning Assistant System (JPLAS) that provides novice students with the element fill‐in‐blank problem (EFP), where students learn Java syntax and basic programming skills by filling in the missing elements in the source code [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the student's programming solution can then be one of four states: (1) syntactically correct and semantically correct, (2) syntactically correct and semantically incorrect, (3) syntactically incorrect and semantically correct, and (4) syntactically incorrect and semantically incorrect [19]. Many programming instruction systems tend to detect syntactic and semantic errors in the programs submitted by students and indicate where and why the errors occur in the programs [11]. One study developed a Web‐based Java Programming Learning Assistant System (JPLAS) that provides novice students with the element fill‐in‐blank problem (EFP), where students learn Java syntax and basic programming skills by filling in the missing elements in the source code [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%