2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2022.3181161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Programmable and Flexible Vision Processor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure a fair comparison with several previously state-of-the-art results, we designed the networks to have the same or similar size. As we focused on edge applications, we limited the network weights to a few megabytes (Luo et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure a fair comparison with several previously state-of-the-art results, we designed the networks to have the same or similar size. As we focused on edge applications, we limited the network weights to a few megabytes (Luo et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The im2col process consumes more clock cycles computing depthwise Conv because the vanilla TPU-like array is not optimized for single-channel Conv. We also compared GEMM between the accelerator and a typical 2D-Mapping processor [1], which supports SIMD fashion vector computation. When performing a GEMM of a 16 × 1024 matrix and a 1024 × 1024 matrix, our accelerator achieves 85.7% latency improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Figure 1 shows, current accelerators are divided into 2D mapping and systolic architectures. 2D mapping accelerators [1] implement finegrained operations through SIMD, which provides strong programmability, but their throughput is limited by memory bandwidth and complex broadcast networks. Systolic architecture accelerators [2][3][4] achieve high throughput but has lower flexibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%