2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00427.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Program for Monitoring Biological Diversity in the Amazon: An Alternative Perspective to Threat‐based Monitoring

Abstract: Ferraz et al. (2008) indicated the need for planning in biological monitoring in the Amazon, and reviewed what they considered recent progress. The problems and solutions they discuss are well known, and it is unlikely that many biologists would disagree with most of them. However, the authors do not indicate that most of these issues are already being addressed in practice in the Amazon, especially by the Programa de Pesquisas em Biodiversidade (PPBio) of the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We collected data in 18 RAPELD sampling modules [29] distributed across a geographical transect of approximately 1000 km transect (15 modules in the PMIR and three modules in the EBMR; Fig 1). Each sampling module (hereafter abbreviated as M, followed by the number of each sampling unit) contained two parallel trails of 5 km each, spaced 1 km apart.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected data in 18 RAPELD sampling modules [29] distributed across a geographical transect of approximately 1000 km transect (15 modules in the PMIR and three modules in the EBMR; Fig 1). Each sampling module (hereafter abbreviated as M, followed by the number of each sampling unit) contained two parallel trails of 5 km each, spaced 1 km apart.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, until further research provides a better understanding of the relationship between sighting rates and population sizes, the autecology of the species being monitored, and the causes behind increases and declines, the appropriate management response to a given trend in sighting rates may not be obvious. It is worth noting, however, that most of these criticisms apply to other monitoring programs in the Amazon (e.g., Ferraz et al 2007;Magnusson et al 2008). It is also the case, in our opinion, that many of these problems reflect a general lack of basic biodiversity data for Amazonian protected areas-a shortcoming that itself may be partly overcome by tracking trends in wildlife populations via monitoring like that described here.…”
Section: Advantages Disadvantages Biases and Usefulness Of River-bmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This standardization makes it more amenable to scaling up information, which has the potential to advise large-scale policy. In Brazil, large-scale systems are implemented that are focused more on ecological conservation research, with locals only involved to reduce costs and increase efficiency (Magnusson et al 2008). Although the institutionalization process with empowerment outcomes occurring in Namibia may be context specific, Latin American conservationists should be aware of the EBS mechanisms for scaling up information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%