2011
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v118.21.1582.1582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Prognostic Index for Acute and Lymphoma Type Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma

Abstract: 1582 Background: Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is a peripheral T-cell malignancy caused by human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-1). HTLV-1 is endemic to the southwestern region of Japan, Caribbean basin, Central and South America, and western Africa. A previous report by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Lymphoma Study Group (JCOG-LSG) identified five prognostic factors: advanced performance status (PS), high lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), age of 40 ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we expected to define a favourable prognosis group in the international PI for aggressive NHL, which consists mostly of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, the difference in the OS between the two risk groups was small. This finding was similar to a recent retrospective nationwide survey in Japan of all patients with acute or lymphoma type at each institute (Katsuya et al , ). Therefore, the JCOG‐PI could not be used to identify patients with aggressive ATL who could be treated with intensive chemotherapy alone and spared from more intensive therapy, such as allo‐HSCT, as is the case with the ATL‐PI (Katsuya et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although we expected to define a favourable prognosis group in the international PI for aggressive NHL, which consists mostly of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, the difference in the OS between the two risk groups was small. This finding was similar to a recent retrospective nationwide survey in Japan of all patients with acute or lymphoma type at each institute (Katsuya et al , ). Therefore, the JCOG‐PI could not be used to identify patients with aggressive ATL who could be treated with intensive chemotherapy alone and spared from more intensive therapy, such as allo‐HSCT, as is the case with the ATL‐PI (Katsuya et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recently, an ATL‐PI consisting of Ann Arbour clinical stage, PS, age, serum albumin level and soluble IL2 receptor level was used to identify three risk groups for patients with acute and lymphoma types of ATL (Katsuya et al , ). However, in that study, both the ATL‐PI and the risk grouping in the 1980's were constructed based on the results of questionnaires collected retrospectively; hence the treatments used were diverse and the prognostic factors might not have been evaluated homogeneously, in contrast to present study based on the three prospective trials (Lymphoma Study Group, ; Katsuya et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the Shimoyama classification, ATLL is classified into 4 disease subtypes: smoldering, chronic, lymphoma, and acute . The acute, lymphoma, and chronic types, when accompanied by unfavorable prognostic factors (hypoalbuminemia, high serum blood urea nitrogen, or high serum lactate dehydrogenase), are regarded as aggressive forms of the disease, and generally have an adverse clinical course . In contrast, the indolent type of ATLL, which includes the smoldering type and the chronic type without unfavorable factors, usually presents with a slower clinical course and progresses to an aggressive type of ATLL following additional genetic alterations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the indolent type of ATLL, which includes the smoldering type and the chronic type without unfavorable factors, usually presents with a slower clinical course and progresses to an aggressive type of ATLL following additional genetic alterations . The prognosis of each clinical subtype varies, and is estimated by clinical parameters of the ATLL prognostic index (ATL‐PI) or the indolent ATL‐PI (iATL‐PI) for the aggressive or indolent type, respectively . Kataoka et al recently reported that several genetic alterations, including IRF4 amplification, 9p24 ( PD‐L1 ) amplification, or 9p21 ( CDKN2A ) deletion, were significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with the indolent type of ATLL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%