A profile of injuries suffered by female soldiers serving in the Australian Army

Abstract

Introduction Female soldiers comprise an important component of any modern army, yet little research has been performed to investigate differences in the profiles of injuries reported by qualified female and male army personnel. Aim The aim of this study was to compare injury rates and patterns between female and male soldiers of the Australian Regular Army (ARA). Methods Data pertaining to all injuries reported by ARA members over a two-year period were accessed from the SENTINEL database and analysed descriptively. Findings regarding injury patterns were reported by most common location, nature, mechanism, and activity being performed at the time of injury. Injury incidence rates (IR) were calculated based on population size, and injury incidence rate ratios (IRR) comparing female and male injury rates were determined. Results A total of 8750 injuries were recorded across the two-year time period (2018–2020) of the study (minor injuries: n = 1766 female, n = 6870 male; serious injuries: n = 19 female, n = 95 male). Higher incidence rates of minor injuries were reported for female soldiers (IR = 20.75 injuries/100 soldiers/year) when compared to male soldiers (IR = 13.60 injuries/100 soldiers/year), with an IRR of 1.53 [95% CI = 1.46–1.60]. More serious injuries were reported at a similar rate between female (IR = 0.22/100 soldiers/year) and male soldiers (IR = 0.21/100 soldiers/year), with an IRR of 1.05 [95% CI = 0.65–1.72]. Female soldiers tended to report more ankle injuries than male soldiers who reported more knee injuries. Physical training and combat training were the most common causes of injury for both sexes. Discussion There were subtle differences in body locations of minor injuries within female and male soldiers. Both minor and more serious injury profiles were otherwise similar between sexes. Therefore, strategies required to minimise injuries in female soldiers may be similar in many respects to strategies required for male soldiers but require some differences to account for the subtle differences in body locations of injury, and so to ensure effectiveness across all personnel.

Prevalence and mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament tears in military personnel: A cross-sectional study in Iran

“…In addition, our study found that ACL injuries were more likely to be associated with military activities than sports, which is different from previous reports that found such injuries to be associated with military training rather than sports [ 11 , 42 ]. However, another study reported that physical exercises and combat activities were the most common causes of injuries [ 43 ]. This may be due to the fact that the content of military and sports activities are somewhat the same in terms of the level of demand and effort-running, jumping, climbing, battling, struggling on the ball or subject; however, military exercises are thought to be mainly similar to the training of professional athletes in order to maintain the expected physical level [ 1 ].…”

Cardiovascular Demand Differences Between Male and Female US Marine Recruits During Progressive Loaded Hikes

“…Loaded hike results of male and female recruits with respect to body mass, relative load, and cardiovascular response. Apart from differences in relative load weights, female recruits generally possess a lower aerobic capacity (34) and strength (upper body . lower body) than male recruits (22).…”