We read with interest the editorial commentary titled "Proficiency-Based Progression Surgical Simulation Training Is an Efficient Adjunct to High-Volume Clinical Experience" and appreciate the insightful comments of Dr. Rachel Frank. 1 The commentary was regarding our original scientific article, "A Proficiency-Based Progression Simulation Training Curriculum to Acquire the Skills Needed in Performing Arthroscopic Bankart and Rotator Cuff RepairsdImplementation and Impact." 2 We agree with Dr. Frank's perspective but would like to bring clarity to the role of a proficiency-based progression (PBP) curriculum for surgical skills training. Fundamental arthroscopic skills (telescoping, triangulation, debridement, drilling, knot tying, and so on) as well as the knowledge of the specific steps to perform (in the proper order) and errors to avoid for a particular procedure should be acquired before participating in surgery on patients. Establishing proficiency via a PBP methodology is critical but refers only to the procedure knowledge and related technical skills, which should not be acquired in the operating room. Operating on real patients, even monitored and mentored, should be more akin to a finishing school than a venue for preliminary learning. Clinical acumen and judgment are essential but different talents than technical skill. Those wisdom traits are (currently) acquired only from broad clinical experience obtained during the comprehensive management of orthopaedic patients, as well as exposure to wise mentors. No extent of proficiency demonstrated in a laboratory setting can substitute for or replace these essential learning experiences. On the other hand, no case numbers or volume of surgical experience can ensure that technical skill is automatically acquired, particularly to a quality-assured and homogeneous performance level. Exposure to surgical procedures does not ensure the acquisition of technical skill, which must be gained through the deliberate practice of a specific skill and execution of the proper technique on a repetitive basis. For that reason, we believe a predominant reliance on the number and types of procedures that a trainee participated in is an unreliable yardstick of his or her surgical technique preparation. 3 Dr. Frank identifies the potential organizational challenge with respect to resident clinical rotations and patient coverage needs that could accompany trainees demonstrating technical proficiencies at significantly different rates. 2 That issue is very real and unsolved at