A process-oriented service infrastructure for networked enterprises

Lukac, Gabriel; Sabol, Tomáš; Tomášek, Martin; Furdik, Karol

doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2016.11.003

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…, 2021), high tech and IT (Cusumano and Gawer, 2002; Gawer and Cusumano, 2014), software (Iyer et al. , 2006; Lukáč et al. , 2017), ICT (Letaifa, 2014) or IC design services (Siripitakchai et al.…”

Section: Analysis Of Alliance Literature On Tccm Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2012); develop relationships as the core ingredients of successful business alliance (Hawkins and Little, 2011); use levers of leadership for ecosystem/network leadership (Cusumano and Gawer, 2002); co-create value in interactional creation (Ramaswamy and Ozcan, 2018); synergise resource sharing and maximise individual and collective economic rents (Lavie, 2006); develop dynamic inter-firm networks with small world features to achieve stability (Iyer et al. , 2006) and achieve interoperability for networked enterprises (Lukáč et al. , 2017).…”

Section: Analysis Of Alliance Literature On Tccm Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Connectivity within a network is also important. Using bridges between firms within a network by building interoperability can improve connectivity and innovation outcomes (Lukáč et al. , 2017; Magas and Kiritsis, 2022).…”

Section: Dne Alliances Over Alliance Life-cyclementioning

confidence: 99%

“…High-tech industries dominated the articles. These include global semiconductor lithography (Adner and Kapoor, 2010), mobile and telecommunications (Basole et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2012), biotechnology and pharma (Baum et al, 2000;Howard et al, 2019;Pomegbe et al, 2021), high tech and IT (Cusumano and Gawer, 2002;Gawer and Cusumano, 2014), software (Iyer et al, 2006;Luk a c et al, 2017), ICT (Letaifa, 2014) or IC design services (Siripitakchai et al, 2015). Firms in these industries require deep domain knowledge and fast paced knowledge sharing to enable quick adaptation and response to fast paced changes in external environment and customer needs.…”

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Dyadic, network and ecosystem alliances: systematic literature review and research agenda

Krishna

2022

JSMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeLiterature on strategic alliances (SAs) is large, diverse and growing. It needs synthesis and analysis for application and further research. Authors have also underlined the need for studies covering differences in structuring, situational application and management of alliances. This systematic literature review aims to cover dyadic, network and ecosystem (DNE) alliances with theory, context, characteristics and methodology (TCCM) methodology covering the life cycle stages of an alliance (pre-formation, formation and management) to uncover insights which inform practice and guide further research on this important subject.Design/methodology/approachThis paper follows systematic literature review (SLR) methodology for research design and article selection and TCCM methodology for analysis. It also analyses the literature on DNE alliances using a nine-box matrix with DNE alliance forming one axis and three alliance lifecycle stages of pre-formation (alliance objectives), formation (alliance design and operationalisation) and post formation (alliance management) stages along the other axis.FindingsAnalysis indicates focus on individual firms and their own customer value proposition (CVP) in the dyadic and network alliances. Industries with fast-paced technological change benefit from loosely coupled alliances. Social context and social exchanges leading to collaboration and collective strengths mark network alliances, with a focus on knowledge creation and dissemination. Ecosystems focus on a collective CVP, which guides alliance behaviour. Ecosystem leadership guides this purpose through governance for sustained competitiveness. Negative consequences (dark side) of alliances can be mitigated by careful design, formation and management of DNE alliances.Research limitations/implicationsWhile literature has focussed on static view of alliances in their industry or social context, this literature review analyses alliances along the dyadic, network and ecosystem typology, thus providing a new lens to study alliances. The review also recognises that alliances evolve over their life-cycle stages and observes their progression through their lifecycle stages aids for fuller comprehension of their behaviour. Areas for future research in structuring, leadership, value co-creation and technological change set an agenda for future research.Practical implicationsDynamic managerial capabilities are drivers of alliance performance. The analysis using the nine-box matrix allows managers to better appreciate the options that exist and the consequences of their actions. Situating their alliance in the appropriate box can allow managers better plan, operationalise and manage their own alliances.Originality/valueThis systematic review compares and contrasts DNE alliances in extant literature and through their lifecycle stages. Insights from TCCM analysis and the nine-box matrix provide unique contribution to both theory and practice in this large and growing domain.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Of Alliance Literature On Tccm Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Analysis Of Alliance Literature On Tccm Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Dne Alliances Over Alliance Life-cyclementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dyadic, network and ecosystem alliances: systematic literature review and research agenda

Krishna

2022

JSMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The second behavioral effect is that advertisers learn their optimal behavior faster under PPC. From the organizational perspective, the management of collaboration among several organizations is recommended to follow best practices and methodologies, such as Six Sigma, PRINCE2, related ISO standards and so on (Lukáč et al. , 2017).…”

Section: Identification Of Trust Variable: a Few Examples From Real Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Non-linear pricing in E-commerce: an exploration

Das

Jadhav

2021

JES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo understand the new non-linear pricing in E-commerce. The present paper aims to put forth an idea of using tie-in agreement in the electronic commerce market in the name of trust in India. According to the Indian antitrust law, tie-in agreement is not allowed to use as compulsory in an offer to the buyer. This means that a tie-in agreement cannot be a compulsion or only an option to the buyer. This means it can be an extra option.Design/methodology/approachThe paper shows that using this logic the sellers are giving two options simultaneously to the buyer: (1) a commodity with a tie-in agreement and (2) the same commodity without a tie-in agreement. Therefore, there are two price mechanisms that are present. Now it is the decision of the buyer to choose between the two. These two price mechanisms create a new variable called trust. If the buyer selects the first option, then that buyer will not be treated as a trustworthy buyer, but in the second case, the buyer would be treated as a trustworthy or the affianced buyer. Therefore, the buyer would be leaning toward the second option. The paper proves that in the second option it would be difficult to minimize the consumer expenditure. As a result, there would be a situation of non-linear pricing in the name of trust which is hidden in the offer. The present work gives both theoretical models and empirical justifications.FindingsWe find that E-wallet is often used when a consumer orders food online but offline cash payment is preferred. Therefore, the offer does matter for the consumer. Hence, the offer can be used to make a tie-in arrangement. Therefore, even if there is a tie-in arrangement in online food servicing applications, the Competition Commission of India can restrict such practices as for illegal tying, the firm has to have the monopoly power in one market and there should be compulsory tie-arrangement in another market. But it does not mean that E-wallet tie-arrangement cannot be ignored as the monopoly power in the online food servicing market can influence the market share in the E-wallet market. Tie-in arrangement is also important, as the consumer has to spend more under cashback offer conditions which reduce the long-run gain of consumers.Originality/valueThe paper considered trust as a new element in forming non-linear pricing. This is new to this literature.

show abstract

Super‐process interoperability optimization architecture in healthcare ultra‐large‐scale systems: A graph‐based multi‐objective approach

Shirazi

2021

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The healthcare industry is more challenging and the super-process interoperability should be planned in order to architecture an informational technology structure of the required data for progression of care. Large-scale enterprises could be provided cross-organization super-processes operations. Therefore, each enterprise's business process management system (BPMS) may be executed cross-organizational BPM as a kind of the process model. This study proposed a Super-process Interoperable Optimized Architecture based on BPMS as a paradigm to satisfy the consistency of cross-organization operations in healthcare industry. For developing the healthcare ultra-large-scale process management system (H-ULS-PMS), the paper provided interoperability optimization with intelligent recommender system in estimation component of BPMS that has been altered to H-ULS-PMS. This system could be recommended the appropriate concept of crossed healthcare process according to the hospitals' requirements. A graph-based multi-objective optimization method has been applied to control distributed resources across the hospitals. The community cloud is used as proposed architecture infrastructure for largely scaled interoperability. A practical case in hospital as a research project of a hospital in Dusseldorf-Wersten of Germany has been studied to show the better interoperability and resource management of the proposed super-process interoperability architecture.

show abstract

A process-oriented service infrastructure for networked enterprises

Cited by 7 publications

References 5 publications

Dyadic, network and ecosystem alliances: systematic literature review and research agenda

Dyadic, network and ecosystem alliances: systematic literature review and research agenda

Non-linear pricing in E-commerce: an exploration

Super‐process interoperability optimization architecture in healthcare ultra‐large‐scale systems: A graph‐based multi‐objective approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About