2018
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmy049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice

Abstract: The Standards represent the consensus view of national stakeholders on the indicators of quality and safety in Australian general practice and primary care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to the heterogeneity of CESFAMs in Chile regarding their level of complexity [ 49 ], geographic location, structural characteristics, number of beneficiaries, funding levels, and other administrative variables, Díaz and Galán [ 9 ] consider that these “contextual and structural differences in health centers would not make the achievement of quality, goals, good practices, accreditation and excellent care comparable to transversal levels”. This places the management of people at the center of the discussion, since, in such varied environments, the management skills of the directors, the variables, the social skills of the staff, and the motivation and leadership of the interdisciplinary teams of primary care are highly relevant both in the planning of improvements, the result of an accreditation process, and in the improvements that are essential to develop a culture of quality management [ 9 , 10 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the heterogeneity of CESFAMs in Chile regarding their level of complexity [ 49 ], geographic location, structural characteristics, number of beneficiaries, funding levels, and other administrative variables, Díaz and Galán [ 9 ] consider that these “contextual and structural differences in health centers would not make the achievement of quality, goals, good practices, accreditation and excellent care comparable to transversal levels”. This places the management of people at the center of the discussion, since, in such varied environments, the management skills of the directors, the variables, the social skills of the staff, and the motivation and leadership of the interdisciplinary teams of primary care are highly relevant both in the planning of improvements, the result of an accreditation process, and in the improvements that are essential to develop a culture of quality management [ 9 , 10 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve a shortage of GPs and the complex medical needs of an aging population, the design of higher-quality general practice courses and standards has received increasing attention recently ( 18 , 19 ). The curriculum and practice standards for one provincial-level administrative region do not necessarily wholly relate to the needs of another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, there has recently been a strong focus on the development of high-quality General Practice curriculum and practice standards (18)(19)(20). The content of international standards for General Practice/Family Medicine curriculums is, of course, an important focus, and guide for the development of the General Practice/Family Medicine discipline in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%