2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(01)00235-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A procedure for production of adapted bacteria to degrade chlorinated aromatics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our present knowledge, only a few studies have dealt with the biodegradation of mono-or dichlorobenzenes (CB or DCB) in bioreactors. However, as reported by Seignez et al, 16 biofiltration and biotrickling filters can represent competitive technologies for the aerobic elimination of chlorinated aromatics when they are adequately inoculated. Indeed, the first, Oh and Bartha 17 reported the removal of 1,2-DCB in an aerobic trickling biofilter, inoculated with strains isolated from industrial sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our present knowledge, only a few studies have dealt with the biodegradation of mono-or dichlorobenzenes (CB or DCB) in bioreactors. However, as reported by Seignez et al, 16 biofiltration and biotrickling filters can represent competitive technologies for the aerobic elimination of chlorinated aromatics when they are adequately inoculated. Indeed, the first, Oh and Bartha 17 reported the removal of 1,2-DCB in an aerobic trickling biofilter, inoculated with strains isolated from industrial sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…From a general viewpoint, the fact that there are fewer studies focusing on the removal of chlorinated VOC in biological filters can be explained by: (1) chlorinated VOC are more recalcitrant compounds than other VOC, and the range of suitable concentrations is limited, due to their toxicity; 16,22 and (2) investment and operating costs for biological reactors treating chlorinated VOC are higher (∼ $14/1000 m 3 of air) than those required for nonchlorinated VOC (∼ $8/1000 m 3 of air). This difference is related to their biodegradability levels and to the necessary additional process maintenance, such as pH adjustment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the degradation of VOC by biofiltration, microorganisms were identified such as Pseudomonas sp. for the degradation of benzene (Sene et al 2002), chlorobenzene (Seignez et al 2001), and toluene (Park et al 2002), Hyphomicrobium sp. for the degradation of dichloromethane (Diks et al 1994), C. sphaerospermum for the degradation of styrene (Qi et al 2002), and Acinetobacter sp.…”
Section: Predominant Microorganisms Involved In the Degradation Of Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different techniques have been developed in order to solve this environmental problem, i.e. incineration, pyrolysis and chemical [3] and biochemical degradation. [4] However, some of them lead to other halogenated pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%