1995
DOI: 10.1190/1.1443746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A procedure for optimally removing localized coherent noise

Abstract: Primary reflections in seismic records are often obscured by coherent noise making processing and interpretation difficult. Trapped water modes, surface waves, scattered waves, air waves, and tube waves to name a few, must be removed early in the processing sequence to optimize subsequent processing and imaging. We have developed a noise canceling algorithm that effectively removes many of the commonly encountered noise trains in seismic data. All currently available techniques for coherent noise attenuation s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From their Figure 12 (f-k displays of raw and filtered VSP data), it can be seen that the median filter was ineffective at higher (above 70 Hz) frequencies. Linville and Meek (1995) developed a multichannel coherent noise reduction algorithm which still needs to prove its effectiveness for the suppression of tube-wave events.…”
Section: Rationale On the Use Of Svd Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From their Figure 12 (f-k displays of raw and filtered VSP data), it can be seen that the median filter was ineffective at higher (above 70 Hz) frequencies. Linville and Meek (1995) developed a multichannel coherent noise reduction algorithm which still needs to prove its effectiveness for the suppression of tube-wave events.…”
Section: Rationale On the Use Of Svd Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They travel along the surface of the earth with velocity/frequency dispersion. Their dispersive nature makes them to mask the shallow reflections, at short offsets, and deep reflections, at long offsets [2,3]. Ground rolls most often constitute a problem for onshore seismic datasets since they do not carry useful information about the deep surface which most times is the target of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, methods such as f-k filtering perform poorly when data is acquired with non-uniform spatial sampling or when the coherent noise in the data is spatially aliased (LINVILLE and MEEK, 1995), and fail to separate noise from signal when they share the same dip (KARSLI and BAYRAK, 2003;HAINES et al, 2007). In some situations, such as when dealing with preserved amplitude data, this method must be avoided (FATTI et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%