A problem with the modified and standardized indirect bonding technique

Kamak, Hasan; Çağlaroğlu, Murat

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.004

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Oral hygiene measure is usually significantly impeded by the fixed appliances used in orthodontic treatment [9]. Biofilm has been found to form around the bracket-adhesive-enamel junction [10, 11]. As a result, white spot lesions become a common problem in orthodontic patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The excessive adhesive and its polymerization shrinkage promote plaque accumulation [10, 11]. Although it is difficult to completely remove the excessive adhesives in both the direct and the indirect bonding [11], indirect bonding seems to reduce the excessive adhesives [12]. Whether the two bonding techniques result in different oral hygiene status remains a question.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wei

et al. 2019

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The direct and indirect bonding techniques are commonly used in orthodontic treatment. The differences of the two techniques deserve evidence-based study. Materials and methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), wherein direct and indirect bonding techniques were used in orthodontic patients were considered. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles published up to December 2018. Grey literature was also searched. Two authors performed data extraction independently and in duplicate using the data collection form. The included trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Results Of the 1557 studies screened, 42 full articles were scrutinized and assessed for eligibility. Eight RCTs (247 participants) were finally included for the analyses. The qualitative synthesis showed that no significant difference existed in the accuracy of bracket placement and oral hygiene status between the two bonding techniques. The indirect bonding was found to involve less chairside time but more total working time compared with the direct bonding. The meta-analysis on bond failure rate demonstrated no significant difference between the direct and indirect bonding (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.78–1.64, I 2 = 22%, P = 0.50). Consistent results were obtained in the subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Weak evidence suggested that the direct and indirect bonding techniques had no significant difference in bracket placement accuracy, oral hygiene status and bond failure rate, for bonding orthodontic brackets. The indirect bonding might require less chairside time but more total working time in comparison with the direct bonding technique. High-quality well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed before a conclusive recommendation could be made. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12903-019-0831-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wei

et al. 2019

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Falsch positionierte Brackets können zu ungewollten und falschen Zahnbewegungen führen [23]. Weiterhin muss ein Überschuss ebenso wie ein Unterschuss an Befestigungsmaterial unbedingt vermieden werden, weil diese die Plaque-Akkumulation und somit das Entstehen von White-Spot-Läsionen fördern [24,25]. Eine weitere wichtige Rolle spielt die Bracket-Verlustrate, die im Sinne des Patienten und Behandlers so gering wie möglich sein sollte.…”

Section: Methodeunclassified

Befestigungsmöglichkeiten von Brackets und Attachments in der Kieferorthopädie

Jungbauer

Liebermann

Kieschnick

et al. 2020

Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungSowohl für die Befestigung von Brackets als auch von Aligner-Attachments stehen verschiedene Materialien und Strategien zur Auswahl. Die Vorbereitung der Schmelz-Oberfläche für die adhäsive Befestigung kann mit Phosphorsäure im Etch and Rinse-Verfahren oder mittels diverser selbstätzender Adhäsive vorgenommen werden. Die Materialien zur Befestigung unterscheiden sich hinsichtlich der Monomermatrix, der Füllkörper und deren Anteile sowie ihres Initiatiorsystems. Brackets können direkt oder indirekt adhäsiv befestigt werden. Attachments für die Behandlung mit Alignern können ein- oder zweiphasig auf die entsprechenden Zähne aufgebracht werden. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, anhand der aktuellen Literatur einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Materialien und Befestigungsstrategien zu geben.

show abstract

A problem with the modified and standardized indirect bonding technique

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Befestigungsmöglichkeiten von Brackets und Attachments in der Kieferorthopädie

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About