2008
DOI: 10.1142/s0219493708002445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Problem in Stochastic Averaging of Nonlinear Filters

Abstract: We consider the stochastic averaging of a particular degenerate problem in nonlinear filtering. In particular, we consider a problem on the cylinder with fast angular diffusion and slow axial diffusion. The observation process depends only on the fast angle. We show that as the separation of scales (between fast and slow) grows, one can approximate the filter for the original problem by a much simpler one. Although our problem is similar to a number of others considered in the literature, the techniques requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that results similar to Theorem 3.1 appear elsewhere in the literature, e.g., Kleptsina et al (1997), Ichihara (2004), Park et al (2008Park et al ( , 2011Park et al ( , 2010, Imkeller et al (2013), but with slightly different assumptions and setup. The main difference is that Theorem 3.1, when compared to the previous works, states the convergence result under the measure parameterized by the true parameter value (i.e., the measure under which the observations are made, where θ = α) with the filters converging for any parameter value.…”
Section: Convergence Of the Filter And Of The Likelihood Functionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that results similar to Theorem 3.1 appear elsewhere in the literature, e.g., Kleptsina et al (1997), Ichihara (2004), Park et al (2008Park et al ( , 2011Park et al ( , 2010, Imkeller et al (2013), but with slightly different assumptions and setup. The main difference is that Theorem 3.1, when compared to the previous works, states the convergence result under the measure parameterized by the true parameter value (i.e., the measure under which the observations are made, where θ = α) with the filters converging for any parameter value.…”
Section: Convergence Of the Filter And Of The Likelihood Functionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In subsection 3.1 we use the convergence results found in Imkeller et al (2013) (see also Park et al (2008Park et al ( , 2011Park et al ( , 2010, Imkeller et al (2013)) to prove convergence in probability of the filter for a class of unbounded test functions (e.g., for the eigenfunctions of the operator L θ ). Then, in subsection 3.2 we will use these results to derive a CLT for the log-likelihood function, which is the main result of the paper.…”
Section: Asymptotic Results Of the Filter And Of The Likelihood Functmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…† By means of various coordinate changes, we can transform the problem so that dW can have any positivedefinite covariance matrix, which may, in fact, depend on Θ εThis type of result has been covered in the literature within the framework of homogenization theory; we refer to [16] and the references therein for more detail. Methodologically, this study is similar to [15] and [16]. In the former work, the observation becomes independent of the system in the limit, while the latter has an explicit dependence on the slow variable in the limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the former work, the observation becomes independent of the system in the limit, while the latter has an explicit dependence on the slow variable in the limit. In [15,16], the fast motion was a fast angular drift. In contrast to these papers, the fast motion (1.1) has both drift and diffusion, so the speed of averaging depends on a spectral gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%